Paris/FFL

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 5: Line 5:
Depending on the type of regulations between the different nodes, we can define eight types of FFL that can be classified into two groups : ''coherent'' and ''incoherent'' FFLs. In ''coherent'' FFLs, the indirect path has the same overall sign as the direct path. The most abundant FFL is the type-1 coherent FFL (C1-FFL) ''(Figure 1)''.
Depending on the type of regulations between the different nodes, we can define eight types of FFL that can be classified into two groups : ''coherent'' and ''incoherent'' FFLs. In ''coherent'' FFLs, the indirect path has the same overall sign as the direct path. The most abundant FFL is the type-1 coherent FFL (C1-FFL) ''(Figure 1)''.
-
In addition to the signs of the edges, to understand the dynamics of the FFL, we must also know how the inputs from the two regulators X and Y are integrated at the promoter of the gene Z. Uri ALON considers that there are two biologically reasonable logic functions : "AND" logic, in which ''both'' X and Y activities are need to be high in order to turn on Z expression and  "OR" logic in which ''either'' X or Y is sufficient ''(Figure 2.A.)''.
+
In addition to the signs of the edges, to understand the dynamics of the FFL, we must also know how the inputs from the two regulators X and Y are integrated at the promoter of the gene Z. Uri ALON considers that there are two biologically reasonable logic functions : "AND" logic, in which ''both'' X and Y activities are need to be high in order to turn on Z expression and  "OR" logic in which ''either'' X or Y is sufficient ''(Figure 2)''.
-
If the input function of the promoter of the gene Z is "OR", Z is expressed when X activity is high. There is no delay following the expression of X. But when X is not expressed anymore, its concentration decreases and reach the activation threshold of Y and Z. Y is not expressed anymore but as the concentration decreases, Z is still expressed. '''The OR-gate C1-FFL allow the gene Z to be expressed about one more hour after the gene X is OFF.''' ''(Figure 2.B.)''
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:OR gate.JPG|thumb|center|350px|Fig. 2 : The C1-FFL with OR logic in the flagella system of ''E. coli''.]]
 +
 
 +
If the input function of the promoter of the gene Z is "OR", Z is expressed when X activity is high. There is no delay following the expression of X. But when X is not expressed anymore, its concentration decreases and reach the activation threshold of Y and Z. Y is not expressed anymore but as the concentration decreases, Z is still expressed. '''The OR-gate C1-FFL allow the gene Z to be expressed about one more hour after the gene X is OFF.''' ''(Figure 3)''
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Delay.JPG|thumb|center|250px|Fig. 3 : Promoter dynamics after an OFF step of X, in the presence of Y. The results are shown for the wild-type bacterium, and for a bacterium in which the gene for Fli1 was deleted from the genome. The FFL generates a delay after an OFF step of X]]
Bibliography :
Bibliography :
-
[http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v31/n1/abs/ng881.html Shen-Orr ''et al''. (2002)]
+
1. [http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v31/n1/abs/ng881.html Shen-Orr ''et al''. (2002)]
-
[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14607112?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Mangan ''et al''. (2003)]
+
2. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14607112?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Mangan ''et al''. (2003)]
-
[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14530388?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Mangan ''et al''. (2003)]
+
3. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14530388?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Mangan ''et al''. (2003)]
-
[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=16729041 Kalir ''et al''. (2005)]
+
4. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=16729041 Kalir ''et al''. (2005)]

Revision as of 17:46, 25 October 2008

Fig. 1 : Structure of a type 1 coherent Feed Forward Loop

A Feed-Forward Loop is a genetic network composed of three nodes. This strong network motif is composed of a transcription factor X that regulates a second transcription factor, Y, and both X and Y regulate Z (Figure 1).

Depending on the type of regulations between the different nodes, we can define eight types of FFL that can be classified into two groups : coherent and incoherent FFLs. In coherent FFLs, the indirect path has the same overall sign as the direct path. The most abundant FFL is the type-1 coherent FFL (C1-FFL) (Figure 1).

In addition to the signs of the edges, to understand the dynamics of the FFL, we must also know how the inputs from the two regulators X and Y are integrated at the promoter of the gene Z. Uri ALON considers that there are two biologically reasonable logic functions : "AND" logic, in which both X and Y activities are need to be high in order to turn on Z expression and "OR" logic in which either X or Y is sufficient (Figure 2).



Fig. 2 : The C1-FFL with OR logic in the flagella system of E. coli.

If the input function of the promoter of the gene Z is "OR", Z is expressed when X activity is high. There is no delay following the expression of X. But when X is not expressed anymore, its concentration decreases and reach the activation threshold of Y and Z. Y is not expressed anymore but as the concentration decreases, Z is still expressed. The OR-gate C1-FFL allow the gene Z to be expressed about one more hour after the gene X is OFF. (Figure 3)

Fig. 3 : Promoter dynamics after an OFF step of X, in the presence of Y. The results are shown for the wild-type bacterium, and for a bacterium in which the gene for Fli1 was deleted from the genome. The FFL generates a delay after an OFF step of X

Bibliography :

1. Shen-Orr et al. (2002)

2. Mangan et al. (2003)

3. Mangan et al. (2003)

4. Kalir et al. (2005)