Team:Harvard/Parts

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(General overview of QPIs)
(General overview of QPIs)
Line 71: Line 71:
==General overview of QPIs==
==General overview of QPIs==
In order to control the expression of exogenous mtrB we sought to create several different inducible systems. As depicted below, these systems consist of a repressor under the control of a constitutive promoter (blue). In the default state, the repressor will bind to the downstream promoter (red), preventing RNA polymerase from attaching to the DNA strand to start transcription. Thus, in this state, mtrB is not expressed.
In order to control the expression of exogenous mtrB we sought to create several different inducible systems. As depicted below, these systems consist of a repressor under the control of a constitutive promoter (blue). In the default state, the repressor will bind to the downstream promoter (red), preventing RNA polymerase from attaching to the DNA strand to start transcription. Thus, in this state, mtrB is not expressed.
-
 
In the presence of an inducer, mtrB expression does occur. In this case, the inducer binds the repressor protein, preventing it from attaching to the DNA sequence of the promoter (green). RNA polymerase is therefore able to bind to the DNA at the promoter, allowing for expression of mtrB.
In the presence of an inducer, mtrB expression does occur. In this case, the inducer binds the repressor protein, preventing it from attaching to the DNA sequence of the promoter (green). RNA polymerase is therefore able to bind to the DNA at the promoter, allowing for expression of mtrB.
-
 
+
##We were able to create three such inducible systems: a lactose inducible system, a tetracycline inducible system, and a heat inducible system.
-
#We were able to create three such inducible systems: a lactose inducible system, a tetracycline inducible system, and a heat inducible system.
+
<div style="text-indent:0pt">[[Image:Harvsystem.png|thumb|650px|center|Induction results in mtrB expression]]
<div style="text-indent:0pt">[[Image:Harvsystem.png|thumb|650px|center|Induction results in mtrB expression]]

Revision as of 17:08, 29 October 2008



Parts Submitted to Registry

Short intro

See list of all parts we submitted.

Contents

\\******change subsection headers*******\\


General overview of mtrB

Many genes are involved in Shewanella’s complex respiratory system (Heidelberg et al. 2002). We focused on mtrB, a 679-amino-acid-long outer membrane protein thought to be involved in the binding of metals and the localization of outer membrane cytochromes during reduction (Bretschger et al. 2007). It is unfortunately toxic in E. coli (Saffarini). Bretschger et al. recently characterized the role of mtrB in anaerobic respiration of Shewanella by looking at the effects of knock-out and complementation of mtrB on the electrical output of Shewanella. It was found that the strain which lacked mtrB produced less than 20% of the current generated by the wild type strain. In complemented strains, where mtrB is expressed constitutively under the control of the lacZ promoter in the knock-out strain, the phenotype was rescued with a similar amount of current being produced to that of the wild type (Bretschger et al. 2007). Not only does this experiment demonstrate the importance of mtrB in reduction in Shewanella, it also suggests a mechanism by which this electrical output could be controlled. Transforming plasmids containing mtrB under the control of an inducible promoter into mtrB knock out Shewanella, would conceivably create a strain of Shewanella which could increase its electrical output in response to the turning-on of the promoter controlling mtrB expression. The creation of a strain with an inducible electrical output could have important applications in biotechnology by creating a system which couples the ability of Shewanella to respond to a diverse array of stimuli with the speed and ubiquity of electricity.

General overview of QPIs

In order to control the expression of exogenous mtrB we sought to create several different inducible systems. As depicted below, these systems consist of a repressor under the control of a constitutive promoter (blue). In the default state, the repressor will bind to the downstream promoter (red), preventing RNA polymerase from attaching to the DNA strand to start transcription. Thus, in this state, mtrB is not expressed.

In the presence of an inducer, mtrB expression does occur. In this case, the inducer binds the repressor protein, preventing it from attaching to the DNA sequence of the promoter (green). RNA polymerase is therefore able to bind to the DNA at the promoter, allowing for expression of mtrB.

    1. We were able to create three such inducible systems: a lactose inducible system, a tetracycline inducible system, and a heat inducible system.
Induction results in mtrB expression

Lac system (will be moved to separate page)

In this system, the lac repressor (LacI) is controlled by a strong constitutive promoter, and is upstream of mtrB under the control of pLac, a LacI regulated promoter. In the default state, LacI is expressed, and inhibits transcription at pLac. Thus, in the default state, mtrB is not expressed. IPTG (an analog of allolactose) induces mtrB expression by binding to LacI, thereby preventing it from inhibiting transcription at pLac.

BBa_K098984 with BioBrick Prefix and Suffix

Inducibility Test for Lac System with GFP Reporter and Weak Promoter

An induction test was designed to test the inducibility of the lac system by IPTG when the repressor (LacI) is driven by a weak promoter.

Experimental Design
Lac Induction Experimental Design

Starter cultures of E. coli with BBa_K098982 were grown overnight. They were then diluted and grown to OD 0.2 before separation into induced (+IPTG, 1mM) and uninduced cultures (-IPTG). OD and GFP readings were taken at time 0, 2, and 4 hours. Additionally, after diluting T=2hrs samples to OD 0.2 for accurate GFP measurements, samples were further diluted 1000x, induced (or not induced) again, and placed back in the incubator until the end of the experiment, when OD and GFP readings were taken.

Results

Induction of GFP expression was observed at both 2 and 4 hours after adding IPTG. Levels of GFP expression in uninduced samples, however, remained relatively the same throughout the 4 hours. Meanwhile, IPTG induction was not observed in either the negative control (BBa_K098981) or the constitutive GFP control (BBa_K098991). Lac Inducibility Results
The 1000x dilutions of samples at 2 hours after induction produced similar results after 5-6 hours. These cells are presumably at a different growth phase from cells that have been growing at much higher concentration for longer, and are thus induced in different conditions. Lac Inducibility 1000x Results

QPIs that we did not use with mtrB

tet

Thermoinducible cI System

This system uses a a temperature sensitive variant of cI lambda to regulate the lambda promoter. The thermoinducible cI lambda system uses cI857 (a mutant form of cI from pGW7 purchased from ATCC) to regulate expression of genes under the control of the lambda promoter. The cI857 repressor is repressed by thermal denaturation. Activity of cI857 begins to decrease around 30 ºC and is fully denatured by around 42 ºC (Leipold et al., 1994). Thus transcription of the gene under the control of the lambda promoter can be induced by increasing the temperature from 30 ºC to 37 ºC-40 ºC.

BBa_K098995

This is a thermosensitive cI inducible system driven by a strong promoter.

BBa_K098995

BBa_K098993

This is a thermosensitive cI inducible system driven by a weak promoter.

BBa_K098993

Inducibility Test for Thermosensitive cI Systems with GFP Reporters

An induction test was designed to test the inducibility of the heat sensitive cI systems. Two constructs were made:

BBa_K098988

This is a thermosensitive cI inducible system driven by a strong promoter and with a GFP indicator.

BBa_K098988
BBa_K098988

This is a thermosensitive cI inducible system driven by a weak promoter and with a GFP indicator.

BBa_K098987
Experimental Design
Thermo Induction Experimental Design

Starter cultures of E. coli with BBa_K098988 and BBa_K098987 were grown overnight. They were then diluted and grown to OD 0.2 before separation into induced (40 ºC) and uninduced cultures (30 ºC). OD and GFP readings were taken at time 0, 2, and 4 hours. Additionally, after diluting T=2hrs samples to OD 0.2 for accurate GFP measurements, samples were further diluted 1000x, induced (or not induced) again, and placed back in their respective incubators until the end of the experiment, when OD and GFP readings were taken.

Results

Slight induction of GFP expression was observed at both 2 and 4 hours after moving samples to 40 ºC. However, since levels of GFP expression in the GFP control (BBa_K098991) went down in samples at 40 ºC, it is possible that the heat affects the ability of constitutive GFP reporters to generate GFP expression. This makes it unclear how much GFP expression is actually induced by the temperature change. A slight decrease in baseline fluorescence was also observed in negative control cells (BBa_K098981).
Thermo Inducibility Results
Results from the 1000x dilutions were inconclusive because the E. coli grows much slower at 30 ºC than at 40 ºC, so by the end of the experiment, there was a vast difference in cell concentration between the two sets of samples.


Edit stuff here; we'll move entire section to new page.