Team:Paris/Modeling/f8

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 57: Line 57:
|comments
|comments
|-
|-
-
|β<sub>13</sub>
+
|β<sub>6</sub>
-
|production rate of FliA-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>13</sub>
+
|production rate of FliA-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>6</sub>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|(K<sub>12</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>})
+
|(K<sub>4</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>})
-
|activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>12</sub>
+
|activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>4</sub>
|nM
|nM
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|n<sub>12</sub>
+
|n<sub>4</sub>
-
|complexation order of FliA-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>12</sub>
+
|complexation order of FliA-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>4</sub>
|no dimension
|no dimension
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|β<sub>2</sub>
+
|β<sub>15</sub>
-
|production rate of OmpR-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>2</sub>
+
|production rate of OmpR-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>15</sub>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|(K<sub>22</sub>/{coef<sub>omp</sub>})
+
|(K<sub>11</sub>/{coef<sub>omp</sub>})
-
|activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>22</sub>
+
|activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>11</sub>
|nM
|nM
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|n<sub>22</sub>
+
|n<sub>11</sub>
-
|complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>22</sub>
+
|complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>11</sub>
|no dimension
|no dimension
|
|

Revision as of 22:23, 20 October 2008

F8DCA.png

We have [FlhDC] = {coefflhDC}expr(pTet) = {coefflhDC} ƒ1([aTc]i)

and [FliA] = {coefFliA}expr(pBad) = {coefFliA} ƒ2([arab]i)

So, at steady-states,

F8.jpg


param signification unit value comments
[expr(pFlhDC)] expression rate of
pFlhDC with RBS E0032
nM.min-1 need for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [aTc]i
and for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [arab]i
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
γGFP dilution-degradation rate
of GFP(mut3b)
min-1 0.0198
[GFP] GFP concentration at steady-state nM need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
(fluorescence) value of the observed fluorescence au need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
conversion conversion ratio between
fluorescence and concentration
nM.au-1 (1/79.429)



param signification
corresponding parameters in the equations
unit value comments
β6 production rate of FliA-pFlhDC with RBS E0032
β6
nM.min-1
(K4/{coeffliA}) activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC
K4
nM
n4 complexation order of FliA-pFlhDC
n4
no dimension
β15 production rate of OmpR-pFlhDC with RBS E0032
β15
nM.min-1
(K11/{coefomp}) activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC
K11
nM
n11 complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC
n11
no dimension



Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation

SumpFlhB.jpg