"
Team:The University of Alberta/30 September 2008
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
can't tell much from the gel2<br> | can't tell much from the gel2<br> | ||
gel1. expected size 3000bp (2-9) and 2000bp(10-16). this is as expected <br> | gel1. expected size 3000bp (2-9) and 2000bp(10-16). this is as expected <br> | ||
| - | gel2. expected size 4000bp (1-8) and 4200bp(10-16). result is as expected, but have some short band(contaminations?) | + | gel2. expected size 4000bp (1-8) and 4200bp(10-16). result is as expected, but have some short band(contaminations?)<br> |
they all seems good! have to sequence to make sure. | they all seems good! have to sequence to make sure. | ||
Revision as of 02:31, 29 October 2008
- Tom
can't tell much from the gel2
gel1. expected size 3000bp (2-9) and 2000bp(10-16). this is as expected
gel2. expected size 4000bp (1-8) and 4200bp(10-16). result is as expected, but have some short band(contaminations?)
they all seems good! have to sequence to make sure.
