"
Utah State/16 July 2008
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: The I20260 construct was mistakenly placed on Amp plates. The transformation was redone today and placed on Kan plates. At least one colony per construct was noted (excepting I20260) and...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | The I20260 construct was mistakenly placed on Amp plates. The transformation was redone today and placed on Kan plates. At least one colony per construct was noted (excepting I20260) and streak plates and liquid colonies were made for all constructs, two colonies if possible per construct. The | + | The I20260 construct was mistakenly placed on Amp plates. The transformation was redone today and placed on Kan plates. At least one colony per construct was noted (excepting I20260) and streak plates and liquid colonies were made for all constructs, two colonies if possible per construct. The E0240 construct from the newly sent pages from iGEM transformed the best by far. The test streak plate from yesterday (to see if the transformations were not successful because of the plates) grew fine, so the source of error from two days ago remains unknown. |
Latest revision as of 21:24, 16 July 2008
The I20260 construct was mistakenly placed on Amp plates. The transformation was redone today and placed on Kan plates. At least one colony per construct was noted (excepting I20260) and streak plates and liquid colonies were made for all constructs, two colonies if possible per construct. The E0240 construct from the newly sent pages from iGEM transformed the best by far. The test streak plate from yesterday (to see if the transformations were not successful because of the plates) grew fine, so the source of error from two days ago remains unknown.
