Minnesota/8 July 2008
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Emartin9808 (Talk | contribs) |
Emartin9808 (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|1. '''Simulations:''' Finish typing into SynbioSS the simulations/rxn network. | |1. '''Simulations:''' Finish typing into SynbioSS the simulations/rxn network. | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |2. '''Restart/Redo PCR''': Problem with original PCR was an error in the calculation of DNA concentration of product. 07-07-2008 we added only 1.0uL of PCR to digest reactions meaning only 3ng of DNA was in the solution. That was not a substantial amount of DNA to be seen in a electrophoretic gel. FIX - recalculated DNA concentration and is 3ng/1uL | + | |2. '''Restart/Redo PCR''': Problem with original PCR was an error in the calculation of DNA concentration of product. 07-07-2008 we added only 1.0uL of PCR to digest reactions meaning only 3ng of DNA was in the solution. That was not a substantial amount of DNA to be seen in a electrophoretic gel. FIX - recalculated DNA concentration and is 3ng/1uL instead of 300ng/uL. Redid PCR2 with 100.0ng DNA instead of 1ng of DNA by adding 10.0uL of DNA. Will run gel with new PCR undigested (original PCR was digested). |
|} | |} |
Revision as of 16:02, 8 July 2008
Back to Notebook Home | |
Go to Previous Day (July 7) | Go to Next Day (July 9) |
1. Simulations: Finish typing into SynbioSS the simulations/rxn network. |
2. Restart/Redo PCR: Problem with original PCR was an error in the calculation of DNA concentration of product. 07-07-2008 we added only 1.0uL of PCR to digest reactions meaning only 3ng of DNA was in the solution. That was not a substantial amount of DNA to be seen in a electrophoretic gel. FIX - recalculated DNA concentration and is 3ng/1uL instead of 300ng/uL. Redid PCR2 with 100.0ng DNA instead of 1ng of DNA by adding 10.0uL of DNA. Will run gel with new PCR undigested (original PCR was digested). |