Team:Paris/Modeling/f8

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:f8DCA.png|thumb]]
[[Image:f8DCA.png|thumb]]
-
<br><br>
+
We have [FlhDC] = {coef<sub>flhDC</sub>}''expr(pTet)'' = {coef<sub>flhDC</sub>} &#131;1([aTc]<sub>i</sub>)
 +
 
 +
and [FliA] = {coef<sub>FliA</sub>}''expr(pBad)'' = {coef<sub>FliA</sub>} &#131;2([arab]<sub>i</sub>)
 +
 
 +
So, at steady-states,
 +
 
 +
[[Image:F7a.jpg|center]]
 +
 
{|border="1" style="text-align: center"
{|border="1" style="text-align: center"
Line 8: Line 15:
|unit
|unit
|value
|value
 +
|comments
|-
|-
-
|[expr(pFlhB)]
+
|[expr(pFlhDC)]
-
|expression rate of <br> pFlhB '''with RBS E0032'''
+
|expression rate of <br> pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032'''
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
-
|see [[Team:Paris/Modeling/Programs|"findparam"]] <br> need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the ''SUM''?
+
|
 +
|need for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [aTc]<sub>i</sub> <br> and for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [arab]<sub>i</sub> <br> and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
|-
|-
|γ<sub>GFP</sub>
|γ<sub>GFP</sub>
Line 18: Line 27:
|min<sup>-1</sup>
|min<sup>-1</sup>
|0.0198
|0.0198
 +
|
|-
|-
|[GFP]
|[GFP]
|GFP concentration at steady-state
|GFP concentration at steady-state
|nM
|nM
-
|need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the ''SUM''?
+
|
 +
|need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
|-
|-
|(''fluorescence'')
|(''fluorescence'')
|value of the observed fluorescence
|value of the observed fluorescence
|au
|au
-
|need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the ''SUM''?
+
|
 +
|need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
|-
|-
|''conversion''
|''conversion''
-
|conversion ration between <br> fluorescence and concentration
+
|conversion ratio between <br> fluorescence and concentration
|nM.au<sup>-1</sup>
|nM.au<sup>-1</sup>
|(1/79.429)
|(1/79.429)
 +
|
|}
|}
Line 42: Line 55:
|unit
|unit
|value
|value
 +
|comments
|-
|-
-
|β<sub>6</sub>
+
|β<sub>13</sub>
-
|production rate of FlhDC-pFlhB '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>6</sub>
+
|production rate of FliA-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>13</sub>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
 +
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|(K<sub>4</sub>/{coef<sub>flhDC</sub>})
+
|(K<sub>12</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>})
-
|activation constant of FlhDC-pFlhB <br> K<sub>4</sub>
+
|activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>12</sub>
|nM
|nM
 +
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|n<sub>4</sub>
+
|n<sub>12</sub>
-
|complexation order of FlhDC-pFlhB <br> n<sub>4</sub>
+
|complexation order of FliA-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>12</sub>
|no dimension
|no dimension
 +
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|-
+
|β<sub>2</sub>
-
|β<sub>14</sub>
+
|production rate of OmpR-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>2</sub>
-
|production rate of FliA-pFlhB '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>14</sub>
+
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
 +
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|(K<sub>10</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>})
+
|(K<sub>22</sub>/{coef<sub>omp</sub>})
-
|activation constant of FliA-pFlhB <br> K<sub>10</sub>
+
|activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>22</sub>
|nM
|nM
 +
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|n<sub>10</sub>
+
|n<sub>22</sub>
-
|complexation order of FliA-pFlhB <br> n<sub>10</sub>
+
|complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>22</sub>
|no dimension
|no dimension
 +
|
|
|
|}
|}

Revision as of 18:49, 16 October 2008

F8DCA.png

We have [FlhDC] = {coefflhDC}expr(pTet) = {coefflhDC} ƒ1([aTc]i)

and [FliA] = {coefFliA}expr(pBad) = {coefFliA} ƒ2([arab]i)

So, at steady-states,

F7a.jpg


param signification unit value comments
[expr(pFlhDC)] expression rate of
pFlhDC with RBS E0032 		nM.min-1 need for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [aTc]i
and for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [arab]i
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
γGFP dilution-degradation rate
of GFP(mut3b) 		min-1 0.0198
[GFP] GFP concentration at steady-state nM need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
(fluorescence) value of the observed fluorescence au need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
conversion conversion ratio between
fluorescence and concentration 		nM.au-1 (1/79.429)



param signification
corresponding parameters in the equations 		unit value comments
β13 production rate of FliA-pFlhDC with RBS E0032
β13 		nM.min-1
(K12/{coeffliA}) activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC
K12 		nM
n12 complexation order of FliA-pFlhDC
n12 		no dimension
β2 production rate of OmpR-pFlhDC with RBS E0032
β2 		nM.min-1
(K22/{coefomp}) activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC
K22 		nM
n22 complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC
n22 		no dimension



Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation

SumpFlhB.jpg
Retrieved from "http://2008.igem.org/Team:Paris/Modeling/f8"