Team:Paris/Modeling/f6
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|comments | |comments | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |β<sub> | + | |β<sub>54</sub> |
- | |production rate of | + | |production rate of FlhDC-pFlgA '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>54</sub> |
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup> | |nM.min<sup>-1</sup> | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |(K<sub> | + | |(K<sub>48</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>}) |
- | |activation constant of | + | |activation constant of FlhDC-pFlgA <br> K<sub>48</sub> |
|nM | |nM | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |n<sub> | + | |n<sub>48</sub> |
- | |complexation order of | + | |complexation order of FlhDC-pFlgA <br> n<sub>48</sub> |
|no dimension | |no dimension | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |β<sub> | + | |β<sub>55</sub> |
- | |production rate of | + | |production rate of FliA-pFlgA '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>55</sub> |
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup> | |nM.min<sup>-1</sup> | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |(K<sub> | + | |(K<sub>49</sub>/{coef<sub>omp</sub>}) |
- | |activation constant of | + | |activation constant of FliA-pFlgA <br> K<sub>49</sub> |
|nM | |nM | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |n<sub> | + | |n<sub>49</sub> |
- | |complexation order of | + | |complexation order of FliA-pFlgA <br> n<sub>49</sub> |
|no dimension | |no dimension | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 22:30, 20 October 2008
We have [FlhDC] = {coefflhDC}expr(pTet) = {coefflhDC} 1([aTc]i)
and [FliA] = {coefFliA}expr(pBad) = {coefFliA} 2([arab]i)
So, at steady-states,
param | signification | unit | value | comments |
[expr(pFlhDC)] | expression rate of pFlhDC with RBS E0032 | nM.min-1 | need for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [aTc]i and for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [arab]i and 5x5 measures for the relation below? | |
γGFP | dilution-degradation rate of GFP(mut3b) | min-1 | 0.0198 | |
[GFP] | GFP concentration at steady-state | nM | need for 20 + 20 measures and 5x5 measures for the relation below? | |
(fluorescence) | value of the observed fluorescence | au | need for 20 + 20 measures and 5x5 measures for the relation below? | |
conversion | conversion ratio between fluorescence and concentration | nM.au-1 | (1/79.429) |
param | signification corresponding parameters in the equations | unit | value | comments |
β54 | production rate of FlhDC-pFlgA with RBS E0032 β54 | nM.min-1 | ||
(K48/{coeffliA}) | activation constant of FlhDC-pFlgA K48 | nM | ||
n48 | complexation order of FlhDC-pFlgA n48 | no dimension | ||
β55 | production rate of FliA-pFlgA with RBS E0032 β55 | nM.min-1 | ||
(K49/{coefomp}) | activation constant of FliA-pFlgA K49 | nM | ||
n49 | complexation order of FliA-pFlgA n49 | no dimension |
Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation