"
Team:ETH Zurich/Wetlab/Overview
From 2008.igem.org
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!-- PUT THE PAGE CONTENT AFTER THIS LINE. THANKS :) --> | <!-- PUT THE PAGE CONTENT AFTER THIS LINE. THANKS :) --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Overview | ||
In order to approach our goal of creating an E. coli carrying a minimal genome, there are three main tracks we are currently working on: | In order to approach our goal of creating an E. coli carrying a minimal genome, there are three main tracks we are currently working on: | ||
| Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
o pulse generator: produce a biobrick that provides for short-term synthesis of the desired gene products | o pulse generator: produce a biobrick that provides for short-term synthesis of the desired gene products | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Genome Reduction | ||
To prove that in vivo restriction and religation is possible is fundamental to our project which relies on the short-term expression of a restriction enzyme and a ligase. While the restriction enzyme will randomly cut DNA, the simultaneous or shortly delayed expression of the ligase should religate the DNA. If the DNA is cut at several sites, relegation will lead to exclusion of chromosomal fragments in a random manner. | To prove that in vivo restriction and religation is possible is fundamental to our project which relies on the short-term expression of a restriction enzyme and a ligase. While the restriction enzyme will randomly cut DNA, the simultaneous or shortly delayed expression of the ligase should religate the DNA. If the DNA is cut at several sites, relegation will lead to exclusion of chromosomal fragments in a random manner. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. Chemostat selection | ||
In the continuous culture of a chemostat, those organisms with the highest rate of proliferation will overgrow those with a smaller growth rate. In order to bypass the need of manually selecting for those ''E. coli'' which have successfully reduced their genomes, we therefore need to introduce a constraint that confers a growth advantage to organisms with smaller genomes. We have chosen to introduce mutations in the nucleotide synthesis pathway to achieve this goal. This will render DNA replication the rate-limiting step of proliferation and therefore be advantageous to organisms with small genomes. | In the continuous culture of a chemostat, those organisms with the highest rate of proliferation will overgrow those with a smaller growth rate. In order to bypass the need of manually selecting for those ''E. coli'' which have successfully reduced their genomes, we therefore need to introduce a constraint that confers a growth advantage to organisms with smaller genomes. We have chosen to introduce mutations in the nucleotide synthesis pathway to achieve this goal. This will render DNA replication the rate-limiting step of proliferation and therefore be advantageous to organisms with small genomes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. Pulse generator | ||
Finally, it is important to restrict the expression of the restriction enzyme to a short period of time. Otherwise, the DNA damage induced would almost certainly kill the organism. Therefore, we want to pulse the expression of the restriction enzyme, with each pulse resulting in one round of random deletion of chromosomal fragments. | Finally, it is important to restrict the expression of the restriction enzyme to a short period of time. Otherwise, the DNA damage induced would almost certainly kill the organism. Therefore, we want to pulse the expression of the restriction enzyme, with each pulse resulting in one round of random deletion of chromosomal fragments. | ||
Revision as of 16:19, 26 October 2008
|
In order to approach our goal of creating an E. coli carrying a minimal genome, there are three main tracks we are currently working on: o genome reduction: show that in vivo restriction and religation is possible o chemostat selection: introduce a limitation that confers a growth advantage to organisms with smaller genomes o pulse generator: produce a biobrick that provides for short-term synthesis of the desired gene products 1. Genome Reduction To prove that in vivo restriction and religation is possible is fundamental to our project which relies on the short-term expression of a restriction enzyme and a ligase. While the restriction enzyme will randomly cut DNA, the simultaneous or shortly delayed expression of the ligase should religate the DNA. If the DNA is cut at several sites, relegation will lead to exclusion of chromosomal fragments in a random manner. 2. Chemostat selection In the continuous culture of a chemostat, those organisms with the highest rate of proliferation will overgrow those with a smaller growth rate. In order to bypass the need of manually selecting for those E. coli which have successfully reduced their genomes, we therefore need to introduce a constraint that confers a growth advantage to organisms with smaller genomes. We have chosen to introduce mutations in the nucleotide synthesis pathway to achieve this goal. This will render DNA replication the rate-limiting step of proliferation and therefore be advantageous to organisms with small genomes. 3. Pulse generator Finally, it is important to restrict the expression of the restriction enzyme to a short period of time. Otherwise, the DNA damage induced would almost certainly kill the organism. Therefore, we want to pulse the expression of the restriction enzyme, with each pulse resulting in one round of random deletion of chromosomal fragments. On the following pages, we will show a detailed description of how we are trying to achieve these three goals. |
