Team:Harvard/Dailybook/Week12/Widgetry
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
What we did: | What we did: | ||
+ | |||
-Retested wt Shewie with IPTG added, Tet added, and heated to 40C to different chambers | -Retested wt Shewie with IPTG added, Tet added, and heated to 40C to different chambers | ||
+ | |||
Results: | Results: | ||
-Heating the chambers to 40C led to no current production | -Heating the chambers to 40C led to no current production | ||
+ | |||
:-May have been a problem with the setup as Shewie seemed to have leaked out | :-May have been a problem with the setup as Shewie seemed to have leaked out | ||
+ | |||
-wt Shewie with IPTG and Tet added had normal current production | -wt Shewie with IPTG and Tet added had normal current production | ||
+ | |||
:-Current observed was between the two wt controls | :-Current observed was between the two wt controls |
Revision as of 21:36, 26 October 2008
Repeat Chemical and Heat Baseline Test
What we did:
-Retested wt Shewie with IPTG added, Tet added, and heated to 40C to different chambers
Results:
-Heating the chambers to 40C led to no current production
- -May have been a problem with the setup as Shewie seemed to have leaked out
-wt Shewie with IPTG and Tet added had normal current production
- -Current observed was between the two wt controls