Team:University of Sheffield/Dimtry

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→20-29 Sept)
 
(7 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!-- If you are creating a new page, start cutting here -->
 +
[[Image:UniShefBanner.jpg|center]]
 +
 +
 +
{| style="color:#888888;background-color:##888888;" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" border="2" bordercolor=#888888 width="85%" align="center"
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:University_of_Sheffield |Introduction]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:University_of_Sheffield /Project|Our project]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:University_of_Sheffield /Modelling|Modelling]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:University_of_Sheffield /Wet Lab|Wet Lab]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:University_of_Sheffield /Lab Books| Our team]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:University_of_Sheffield /Timetable| Timetable]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:University_of_Sheffield /Misc| Miscellaneous]]
 +
|}
 +
 +
<!-- and finish cutting here! -->
 +
<!-- Nested Wet Lab menu -->
 +
{| style="color:#888888;background-color:##888888;" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1" border="1" bordercolor=#888888 width="85%" align="center"
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:University_of_Sheffield /Wet Lab|Introduction]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:University_of_Sheffield /Protocols|Protocols]]
 +
|}
 +
 +
==Lab book: Production and extraction of CAI==  
==Lab book: Production and extraction of CAI==  
 +
 +
===Original Protocol===
The original protocol of CAI production, which is a slightly modified version of the protocol described in the paper,[1] was as follows:
The original protocol of CAI production, which is a slightly modified version of the protocol described in the paper,[1] was as follows:
Line 25: Line 49:
9.) Injected in (2x25cm) ethyl-pyridine HPLC column and eluted using a gradient of increasing ethyl acetate in hexanes (0-80%) at 20mL/min.  
9.) Injected in (2x25cm) ethyl-pyridine HPLC column and eluted using a gradient of increasing ethyl acetate in hexanes (0-80%) at 20mL/min.  
 +
 +
 +
===Early adaptations===
After taking cost and time considerations into account, it was decided that the usage of the HPLC in our in experiment was not possible, but since the purity of the CAI was not essential as long as the CAI was in high concentration, it was not a problem (we expected our sensor to sense bacteria in water in not perfect conditions).
After taking cost and time considerations into account, it was decided that the usage of the HPLC in our in experiment was not possible, but since the purity of the CAI was not essential as long as the CAI was in high concentration, it was not a problem (we expected our sensor to sense bacteria in water in not perfect conditions).
Line 30: Line 57:
 +
===Day-to-day lab book===
Next is the copy of the day-to-day lab book:
Next is the copy of the day-to-day lab book:
-
3-10 Sept 08
+
====3-10 Sept 08====
A series of unsuccessful attempts to grow the cells in M9 at room temperature overnight. All medium and human error minimised:
A series of unsuccessful attempts to grow the cells in M9 at room temperature overnight. All medium and human error minimised:
Line 40: Line 68:
 +
In the end there was no growth in the medium.
 +
 +
====11-18 Sept====
-
11-18 Sept
 
The experiment was changed. A variety of temperatures was tested, the overnight growth was replaced by a 36h and LB was used a control.
The experiment was changed. A variety of temperatures was tested, the overnight growth was replaced by a 36h and LB was used a control.
The results were as follows:
The results were as follows:
 +
 +
*In temperatures above 30C the growth was very poor. There was no noticeable growth at 37C.
 +
*LB yeilded a slightly higher growth rate.
 +
*In the end several 36-48H cultures were were induced and the used in the CAI extraction.
 +
 +
During this time, extraction of CAI was experimented. There were no new changes to the method. In the end several samples were obtained. They are yet to be tested.
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +

Latest revision as of 13:15, 29 October 2008

UniShefBanner.jpg


Introduction Our project Modelling Wet Lab Our team Timetable Miscellaneous
Introduction Protocols


Contents

Lab book: Production and extraction of CAI

Original Protocol

The original protocol of CAI production, which is a slightly modified version of the protocol described in the paper,[1] was as follows:

1.) Transform plasmid pTrc99A in E.coli DH5a How? Heat shock

2.) Grow at room temp, with aeration, overnight Medium: 2.4 Litres of M9 medium with

  • 9.6 g glucose (4g/l)
  • 1.2g leucine(0.5g/l)
  • 0.24g ampicillin (0.1g/l)

3.) Induce cqsA expression with 0.5 mM IPTG for 16 hours

4.) Centrifuge at 10000 x g for 60s

5.) Pass through a 0.22μm filter

6.) Mix the now cell-free culture fluid with 0.6v (?) dichloromethane (DCM) in separatory funnel. Isolate organic phase, then evaporate.

7.) Dissolve in DCM, and purify through silica gel with 0.5L of 7:3 DCM:methanol. Concentrate with evaporation

8.) 50-100mg of concentrate dissolved in ~1ml DCM

9.) Injected in (2x25cm) ethyl-pyridine HPLC column and eluted using a gradient of increasing ethyl acetate in hexanes (0-80%) at 20mL/min.


Early adaptations

After taking cost and time considerations into account, it was decided that the usage of the HPLC in our in experiment was not possible, but since the purity of the CAI was not essential as long as the CAI was in high concentration, it was not a problem (we expected our sensor to sense bacteria in water in not perfect conditions). Therefore steps 7-9 were dropped.


Day-to-day lab book

Next is the copy of the day-to-day lab book:


3-10 Sept 08

A series of unsuccessful attempts to grow the cells in M9 at room temperature overnight. All medium and human error minimised: Different M9 stocks Different method of adding cells to media


In the end there was no growth in the medium.

11-18 Sept

The experiment was changed. A variety of temperatures was tested, the overnight growth was replaced by a 36h and LB was used a control. The results were as follows:

  • In temperatures above 30C the growth was very poor. There was no noticeable growth at 37C.
  • LB yeilded a slightly higher growth rate.
  • In the end several 36-48H cultures were were induced and the used in the CAI extraction.

During this time, extraction of CAI was experimented. There were no new changes to the method. In the end several samples were obtained. They are yet to be tested.







References

[1] The Major Vibrio cholerae Autoinducer CAI-1 Supplementary Information" Nature 450, 883-886 (6 December 2007) by Douglas A. Higgins, Megan E. Pomianek, Christina M. Kraml, Ronald K. Taylor, Martin F. Semmelhack & Bonnie L. Bassler

Retrieved from "http://2008.igem.org/Team:University_of_Sheffield/Dimtry"