Team:ETH Zurich/Project/Conclusions

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 01:42, 30 October 2008

In this iGEM project we addressed the question of how the minimal genome of a particular organism, E.coli, could be identified and made available in the form of minimal strain to researchers. The motivations that made the finding of a minimal genome strain appealing were two folds: the indication that in essentiality are hidden some of fundamental yet missing biological properties and the desire of providing a convinient chassis for synthetic biology. In this contest we required our ideal minimal genome to have two properties:

to be as simple as possible, meaning as much reduced in genome size and gene content as possible
to be vital, meaning that we were aiming for strains able to provide a reactive and productive background on which to add synthetic functionalities.

The approach we proposed was based on two main considerations. First, that the space solution of possible minimal genomes is huge and untractable without taking an heuristic approach. Second, that evolution probably worked in the contrary sense, by constructing complex organism starting from a very minimal set of genes. Combining the two concepts, we decided to take an evolutionary reductive approach. In order to do so, we had to invert two main biological mechanisms. First, losing part of the genome should made possible, while cells (for the evolution motivations discussed before) are indeed more equipped for uptaking chromosomal parts. Second, to give a fitness advantage

are two-fold and all related to the semplicity and essentiality of minimal genomes: they may lead to fundamental biological insights and be

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 <!-- PUT THE PAGE CONTENT AFTER THIS LINE. THANKS :) -->
-In this iGEM project we addressed the question of how the minimal genome of a particular organism, E.coli, could be identified and made available in the form of minimal strain to researchers. The motivations that made the finding of a minimal genome strain appealing are two folds: the indication that in essentiality are hidden some fundamental biological properties and the desire of having a convinient chassis for synthetic biology. In this contest we required our ideal minimal genome to have two properties:
+In this iGEM project we addressed the question of how the minimal genome of a particular organism, E.coli, could be identified and made available in the form of minimal strain to researchers. The motivations that made the finding of a minimal genome strain appealing were two folds: the indication that in essentiality are hidden some of fundamental yet missing biological properties and the desire of providing a convinient chassis for synthetic biology. In this contest we required our ideal minimal genome to have two properties:
 * to be as simple as possible, meaning as much reduced in genome size and gene content as possible
 * to be vital, meaning that we were aiming for strains able to provide a reactive and productive background on which to add synthetic functionalities.
+The approach we proposed  was based on two main considerations. First, that the space solution of possible minimal genomes is huge and untractable without taking an heuristic approach. Second, that evolution probably worked in the contrary sense, by constructing complex organism starting from a very minimal set of genes. Combining the two concepts, we decided to take an evolutionary reductive approach. In order to do so, we had to invert two main biological mechanisms. First, losing part of the genome should made possible, while cells (for the evolution motivations discussed before) are indeed more equipped for uptaking chromosomal parts. Second, to give a fitness advantage