Team:Johns Hopkins/Notebook/GROUP 8: Assembly Progress

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(wMOaIkAxXVQrTRfcc)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{JHU}}
+
SJQG3s <a href="http://pcohebxttfla.com/">pcohebxttfla</a>, [url=http://kmuwpvuixcjf.com/]kmuwpvuixcjf[/url], [link=http://tmjgbelrbqsd.com/]tmjgbelrbqsd[/link], http://lxcmngbuqgfa.com/
-
 
+
-
Planned Schedule for Further Work:<br>
+
-
  October 31st- Successful transformants from either set of ligations (of Promoter + Fluorescent
+
-
  Protein) and transformations will be grown up for Miniprep. <br>
+
-
  November 1st- These pieces will be miniprepped and digested. Digested fragments will be ligated
+
-
  together with the terminator in the middle, into a pRS414 yeast/bacterial shuttle vector. 
+
-
  Non-digested fragments of a promoter + fluorescent protein will also individually be transformed
+
-
  into yeast, with hopes that they will fluoresce.<br>
+
-
  November 3rd- Full construct insert will be transformed into yeast, pending identity verification.<br>
+
-
  November 6th- Pretty Yeast! (Hopefully). <br>
+
-
 
+
-
  Date: Week of 10/25/08-11/2/08
+
-
  Name: J and J
+
-
  Summary:  Using Qiagen Kits, new minipreps and RE digests were completed for:
+
-
    Venus YFP (BBa_K110022)
+
-
    alpha promoters (BBa_110005, BBa_K110006)
+
-
    a promoter (BBa_K110016)
+
-
    mCherry (BBa_E2060)
+
-
    dsRed (BBa_E1010)
+
-
  See Picture- [[Media:081026kitEXSPindALL.tif]]
+
-
  Annotations of picture-
+
-
[http://www.jhu.edu/iGEM/GroupOther:Other/2008-10-28.Restriction%20Digest%20of%20Team%20Parts.James.html Restriction Digest of Team Parts]<br>
+
-
  These fragments were gel purified, and are our current working batch.  They appear to be far
+
-
  cleaner (less contaminating protein and DNA), and digests have produced cut fragments of high
+
-
  enough concentrations to work with (finally).  Assembly ligations of promoter + fluorescent
+
-
  protein have been re-attempted, again into pBB414 (CAMr) vectors as well as the pRS414
+
-
  yeast/bacterial shuttle vector.<br>
+
-
  Past Miniprep methods have proven difficult (STET BOILING). These digests were cut from
+
-
  the gel and ligated together with PBC SK(-) Bacterial plasmid, and transformed into DH5alpha
+
-
  competent cells. The transformation failed, either due to:
+
-
  1) The close proximity of E and P sites at the MCS, so close that each interferes with
+
-
        restriction enzyme binding of the other.
+
-
  2) a mislabeled PBC sK-, lacking chloramphenicol resistance.
+
-
        A transformation was set up on the 28th with cut pRS414 (yeast bacteria shuttle
+
-
        vector), as well as another  attempted ligation with PBC SK(-). pUC19 was also cut
+
-
        and ligations will be attempted on the 29th.
+
-
 
+
-
  Date: October 22-25, 2008
+
-
  Authors: James/Jonathan
+
-
  We have made repeated attempts to digest our minipreps with restriction enzymes for assembly
+
-
  {E/S or X/P) but all gels produce either not enough cut product to work with or the digest
+
-
  runs extremely  messily. See: [http://baderlab.bme.jhu.edu:8888/moodle18/mod/data/view.php?d=16&rid=4991 Individual Part Assembly Enzyme Digestion, 2 and 5ul]
+
-
  This particular digest produced some purifiable bands for the promoters, but overall not enough
+
-
  digested product could be extrated.<br>
+
-
  The reasons for this are most likely twofold:
+
-
    a)  The miniprep method (STET Boiling lysozyme protocol) does not remove a lot of contaminating
+
-
        proteins and unwanted DNA, producing very 'dirty' DNA.
+
-
    b)  The proper balance between restriction enzyme and miniprep DNA amounts has not yet been reached.
+
-
        Too much DNA may inhibit enzyme digestion, and may account for a lack of clear banding at the
+
-
        expected product size range.
+
-
  We will continue to adjust the protocol to attempt a clean cut.
+
-
 
+
-
  Date: Week of October 20th, 2008
+
-
  Authors: James/Jonathan
+
-
  Several things-
+
-
  All initial biobricks were digested with E/P to confirm their identity-where possible,
+
-
  bacterial perms in pGEM-T were used, due to biobrick vectors not producing high-copy numbers. 
+
-
  The digest photographs can be found here:
+
-
  [http://baderlab.bme.jhu.edu:8888/moodle18/mod/data/view.php?d=16&rid=4993 Initial Digest Verification- Messy]
+
-
  All digests ran far too slow, possibly from overloading of enzyme.  Gels were very messy, and
+
-
  there are plans to repeat using proper concentrations of miniprep DNA vs. restriction enzymes.<br>
+
-
  Simultaneously, PCR was performed on all biobrick parts again.  If in pGEM, T7/SP6
+
-
  promoters were used, and parts in biobrick vectors were amplified using the iGEM sequencing
+
-
  primers.  See: [http://baderlab.bme.jhu.edu:8888/moodle18/mod/data/view.php?d=16&rid=4992 Biobrick Part PCR]
+
-
  The PCR was directly taken and digested with proper enzymes for assembly (E/S or X/P), gel
+
-
  purified, and then ligated together into a vector pBB414 (Cam resistant).  Unfortunately,
+
-
  the Taq polymerase was not disabled, and most likely polymerized at the restriction overhangs,
+
-
  leading to poor transformation counts.
+
-
 
+
-
  Date: October 12th, 2008
+
-
  Author: Jonathan
+
-
  PCR was performed on all assembly minipreps using the iGEM vR and F primers
+
-
  (normally used for sequencing).  All lanes yielded unusual results, none of
+
-
  which are at the expected product size.
+
-
  PCR Gel picture:
+
-
  [http://baderlab.bme.jhu.edu:8888/moodle18/mod/data/view.php?d=16&rid=4973 PCR of all BBV parts and assemblies]
+
-
  *Note: iGEM primers are each approximately 150 bp away from cloning site,
+
-
  so products will be +300 bp than expected.  Lower row is another Nsp1 digest- it failed, but
+
-
  that was expected.
+
-
 
+
-
  Date: October 3rd, 2008
+
-
  Author: Jonathan
+
-
  All assemblies were digested with enzyme Nsp1 - the normal Chloramphenicol biobrick
+
-
  vector (without no insert)has Nsp1 sites approximately opposite each other, so digestion
+
-
  should yield a fragment of one size, half the normal Cam vector size.
+
-
  If there is an insert present, digestion will yield two bands of different sizes.
+
-
  Results of Nsp1 digest:
+
-
  [http://baderlab.bme.jhu.edu:8888/moodle18/mod/data/view.php?d=16&rid=4990 Nsp1 Digest Results]
+
-
  While BBa_K110005 has an Nsp1 site within its sequence, the fragmentation pattern
+
-
  of the bands is still bizarre.
+
-
 
+
-
  Date: October 2nd, 2008
+
-
  Author: Jonathan
+
-
  Preps or previous clones were re-made, using a Qiagen kit and column.  Quantities were too
+
-
  low to work with (<40ng/ul)
+
-
 
+
-
  Date:  Week of September 22nd, 2008
+
-
  Author: Jonathan
+
-
  Performed the following digest on all available biobrick parts, to begin assembly process:
+
-
 
+
-
  Part:              Orientation:  BBPart#/Clone:  Vector:    Enzymes Used:
+
-
  Alpha Promoter    LtR            BBa_K110005/1  pGEM-T    E/S
+
-
  Alpha Promoter    LtR            BBa_K110006/1  pGEM-T    E/S
+
-
  a Promoter        RtL            BBa_K110016/1  Cam BBV    X/P
+
-
  mCherry FP        LtR            BBa_E2050      Kan BBV    X/P
+
-
  mCherry FP        LtR            BBa_E2060      Kan BBV    X/P
+
-
  dsRed FP          LtR            BBa_E1010      Kan BBV    X/P
+
-
  Venus YFP          LtR            BBa_K110020/1  pGEM-T    X/P
+
-
  Venus YFP          RtL            BBa_K110021/2  pGEM-T    E/S
+
-
  Long Terminator    -            BBa_K110003/2  pGEM-T    E/P<br>
+
-
  Each promoter was ligated to a flourescent protein of the proper orientation (i.e. Alpha Promoter
+
-
  5 to mCherry 2050, 2060, and dsRed 1010 and Venus 20, etc.):<br>
+
-
  Alpha Promoter 5.1 + mCherry 2050         
+
-
  Alpha Promoter 5.1 + mCherry 2060
+
-
  Alpha Promoter 5.1 + dsRed1010
+
-
  Alpha Promoter 6.1 + mCherry 2050
+
-
  Alpha Promoter 6.1 + mCherry 2060
+
-
  Alpha Promoter 6.1 + dsRed1010
+
-
  Alpha Promoter 5.1 + Venus 20.1
+
-
  Alpha Promoter 6.1 + Venus 20.1
+
-
  a Promoter 16.1 + Venus YFP 21.1
+
-
 
+
-
  Each was assembled into the chloramphenicol biobrick vector, ligated O/N,
+
-
  The next day, each was transformed into DH5alpha cells (along with a -insert and negative control),
+
-
  and then plated on LB cam plates.  12 colonies were picked for each ligation, and 4 of each assmebly
+
-
  was miniprepped. 
+
-
  Digestion by E/P yielded  (Gel has two rows):
+
-
  [http://baderlab.bme.jhu.edu:8888/moodle18/mod/data/view.php?d=16&rid=4988 Upper Row]
+
-
  [http://baderlab.bme.jhu.edu:8888/moodle18/mod/data/view.php?d=16&rid=4989 Lower Row]
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
<html>
+
-
  </font>
+
-
</div>
+
-
</body>
+
-
</html>
+
-
[[Media:Example.ogg]]
+

Latest revision as of 15:57, 28 March 2016

SJQG3s <a href="http://pcohebxttfla.com/">pcohebxttfla</a>, [url=http://kmuwpvuixcjf.com/]kmuwpvuixcjf[/url], [link=http://tmjgbelrbqsd.com/]tmjgbelrbqsd[/link], http://lxcmngbuqgfa.com/

Retrieved from "http://2008.igem.org/Team:Johns_Hopkins/Notebook/GROUP_8:_Assembly_Progress"