Team:ETH Zurich/Team Page
From 2008.igem.org
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
This is the mechanism that selects for our preferred organisms within the population. We thought to use the most natural and by that simplest approach, which translates to just using the growth rate of the organism. Those organisms that replicate faster will prevail over time against competitors in the population with a lower growth rate. <br /> | This is the mechanism that selects for our preferred organisms within the population. We thought to use the most natural and by that simplest approach, which translates to just using the growth rate of the organism. Those organisms that replicate faster will prevail over time against competitors in the population with a lower growth rate. <br /> | ||
==== The Fitness Function ====<br /> | ==== The Fitness Function ====<br /> | ||
- | The objective function is responsible for the evolutionary selection of strains with a smaller genome. We expect that for deletions of genes that even only slightly influence the growth rate in a negative way, there will be a big selection pressure and those individuals won’t stay in the population. To ensure that we can select also for those individual and by that have the ability to minimize more, we are trying to introduce a mechanism to amplify the benefits of a smaller genome. By this amplification we are hoping to cancel out the negative effects of these deletions and that way drive the minimization further. In general the reduction of the genome in this approach will only proceed till the point, where positive effects of genome reduction by the objective function and the negative effects of gene deletions combined influence the fitness negatively. </p> | + | The objective function is responsible for the evolutionary selection of strains with a smaller genome. We expect that for deletions of genes that even only slightly influence the growth rate in a negative way, there will be a big selection pressure and those individuals won’t stay in the population. To ensure that we can select also for those individual and by that have the ability to minimize more, we are trying to introduce a mechanism to amplify the benefits of a smaller genome. By this amplification we are hoping to cancel out the negative effects of these deletions and that way drive the minimization further. In general the reduction of the genome in this approach will only proceed till the point, where positive effects of genome reduction by the objective function and the negative effects of gene deletions combined influence the fitness negatively.</p> |
</td> | </td> | ||
<td bgcolor="#000000"> | <td bgcolor="#000000"> |
Revision as of 16:54, 29 July 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[http://www4.clustrmaps.com/user/d1a56e05 http://www4.clustrmaps.com/stats/maps-no_clusters/2008.igem.org-Team-ETH_Zurich-thumb.jpg] |