Team:Paris/Modeling/f3

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 31: Line 31:
|[expr(pFlhDC)]
|[expr(pFlhDC)]
|expression rate of <br> pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032'''
|expression rate of <br> pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032'''
-
|nM.s<sup>-1</sup>
+
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|see [[Team:Paris/Modeling/Programs|"findparam"]] <br> need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the ''SUM''?
|see [[Team:Paris/Modeling/Programs|"findparam"]] <br> need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the ''SUM''?
|-
|-
|γ<sub>GFP</sub>
|γ<sub>GFP</sub>
|dilution-degradation rate <br> of GFP(mut3b)
|dilution-degradation rate <br> of GFP(mut3b)
-
|s<sup>-1</sup>
+
|min<sup>-1</sup>
-
|ln(2)/3600
+
|0.0198
|-
|-
|[GFP]
|[GFP]
Line 65: Line 65:
|β<sub>12</sub>
|β<sub>12</sub>
|production rate of FliA-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>12</sub>
|production rate of FliA-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>12</sub>
-
|nM.s<sup>-1</sup>
+
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|
|
|-
|-
-
|(K<sub>11</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>}<sup>n<sub>11</sub></sup>)
+
|(K<sub>11</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>})
|activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>11</sub>
|activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>11</sub>
-
|nM<sup>n<sub>11</sub></sup>
+
|nM
|
|
|-
|-
Line 84: Line 84:
|
|
|-
|-
-
|(K<sub>19</sub>/{coef<sub>ompR</sub>}<sup>n<sub>19</sub></sup>)
+
|(K<sub>19</sub>/{coef<sub>ompR</sub>})
|activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>19</sub>
|activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>19</sub>
-
|nM<sup>n<sub>19</sub></sup>
+
|nM
|
|
|-
|-

Revision as of 22:26, 4 September 2008

F3omp.jpg
At the steady-state, we have
FliAeq.jpg

and

OmpReq.jpg

so the expression

F3expr.jpg

gives

F3FliA.jpg

and

F3OmpR.jpg

and for calculated values of the TF,

F3FliACalc.jpg

and

F3OmpRCalc.jpg



param signification unit value
[expr(pFlhDC)] expression rate of
pFlhDC with RBS E0032
nM.min-1 see "findparam"
need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
γGFP dilution-degradation rate
of GFP(mut3b)
min-1 0.0198
[GFP] GFP concentration at steady-state nM need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
(fluorescence) value of the observed fluorescence au need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
conversion conversion ration between
fluorescence and concentration
nM.au-1 (1/79.429)



param signification
corresponding parameters in the equations
unit value
β12 production rate of FliA-pFlhDC with RBS E0032
β12
nM.min-1
(K11/{coeffliA}) activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC
K11
nM
n11 complexation order of FliA-pFlhDC
n11
no dimension
β2 production rate of OmpR-pFlhDC with RBS E0032
β2
nM.s-1
(K19/{coefompR}) activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC
K19
nM
n19 complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC
n19
no dimension



Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation

SumFlhDC1.jpg