Team:Paris/Modeling/f6

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 23:48, 29 September 2008

param	signification	unit	value
[expr(pFlgA)]	expression rate of pFlgA with RBS E0032	nM.min^-1	see "findparam" need for 20 + 20 measures and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
γ_GFP	dilution-degradation rate of GFP(mut3b)	min^-1	0.0198
[GFP]	GFP concentration at steady-state	nM	need for 20 + 20 measures and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
(fluorescence)	value of the observed fluorescence	au	need for 20 + 20 measures and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
conversion	conversion ratio between fluorescence and concentration	nM.au^-1	(1/79.429)

param	signification corresponding parameters in the equations	unit	value
β₅₅	production rate of FlhDC-pFlgA with RBS E0032 β₅₅	nM.min^-1
(K₄₉/{coef_flhDC})	activation constant of FlhDC-pFlgA K₄₉	nM
n₄₉	complexation order of FlhDC-pFlgA n₄₉	no dimension
β₅₆	production rate of FliA-pFlgA with RBS E0032 β₅₆	nM.min^-1
(K₅₀/{coef_fliA})	activation constant of FliA-pFlgA K₅₀	nM
n₅₀	complexation order of FliA-pFlgA n₅₀	no dimension

Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[Image:f6DCA.png|thumb]] At the steady-state, we have
+[[Image:f6DCA.png|thumb]]
-<center>[[Image:FlhDCeq.jpg]]</center>
-and
-<center>[[Image:FliAeq.jpg]]</center>
-so the expression
-<center>[[Image:f6expr.jpg]]</center>
-gives
-<center>[[Image:f6FlhDC.jpg]]</center>
-and
-<center>[[Image:f6FliA.jpg]]</center>
-and for ''calculated values of the TF'',
-<center>[[Image:f6FlhDCCalc.jpg]]</center>
-and
-<center>[[Image:f6FliACalc.jpg]]</center>
 <br><br>
@@ Line 50: / Line 30: @@
 |-
 |''conversion''
-|conversion ration between <br> fluorescence and concentration
+|conversion ratio between <br> fluorescence and concentration
 |nM.au<sup>-1</sup>
 |(1/79.429)
@@ Line 99: / Line 79: @@
 Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation
-<center>[[Image:SumpFlgA.jpg]]</center>
+[[Image:SumpFlgA.jpg|center]]