"
Team:Paris/Network analysis and design/System improvements
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→System Improvements) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == System Improvements == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| | {| | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
| *** | | *** | ||
| Links resulting | | Links resulting | ||
| + | |- style="background: #dddddd;" | ||
| + | !colspan="4" | Main conclusion: we keep S2 | ||
|}</center> | |}</center> | ||
Revision as of 18:58, 25 October 2008
System Improvements
| System Improvements | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Description | Evaluation | Links |
| Core system | Figure core system | Zero | Liks core system |
| Modular system | Figure modular system | ** | Links Garcia-Ojalvo |
| Resulting system | Figure resulting system | *** | Links resulting |
| Main conclusion: we keep S2 | |||
Core system does not oscillate. How can we enhance it?
We need a 'delay' so we can: 1 add more genes to the circuit 2 use quorum sensing (qs)
we chose quorum sensing that can allowed both 'delay' and population synchonization. two ways to add it: S4 and S2.
We first analyse S4 due to modularity.
Inspired from Garcia-Ojalvo: oscillating repressilator + oscillating qs module = synchronized oscillations
we tried s4:
damped oscillating core system + oscillating qs module = damped oscillations.
We continue with S2:
S0 module in S4 gived us insides in parameters analysis for S2.
given analysis results we keep S2.
