Team:Imperial College/Transformation Results
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Imperial/StartPage2}} | {{Imperial/StartPage2}} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | {{Imperial/Box2|Transformation of ''B.subtilis''|In order to expand the use of ''B.subtilis'' as a potential chassis we investigated the different protocols used for | + | {{Imperial/Box2|Transformation of ''B. subtilis''|In order to expand the use of ''B. subtilis'' as a potential chassis we investigated the different protocols used for its transformation. ''B. subtilis'' is used as the model for Gram-positive bacterium and has been extensively studied: A variety of protocols have thus been developed for transformation. We wished to investigate two different protocols, one relying upon natural competence of stressed ''B. subtilis'' and the other using electroporation.}} |
{{Imperial/Box1|Transformation Protocol 1 - Natural Competency|'''[https://2008.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Transformation Click this link for full Transformation protocol 1 '''] | {{Imperial/Box1|Transformation Protocol 1 - Natural Competency|'''[https://2008.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Transformation Click this link for full Transformation protocol 1 '''] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
'''Results''' | '''Results''' | ||
*We performed a transformation using the integration plasmid pDR110. The competent cells were grown to an O.D.<sub>600</sub> of 2.0 and transformed with 0, 40ng and 400ng of DNA. Transformants were selected with the antibiotic streptinomycin, the resistance of which is encoded by the pDR110. | *We performed a transformation using the integration plasmid pDR110. The competent cells were grown to an O.D.<sub>600</sub> of 2.0 and transformed with 0, 40ng and 400ng of DNA. Transformants were selected with the antibiotic streptinomycin, the resistance of which is encoded by the pDR110. | ||
- | *The results showed that the ''B.subtilis'' transformed with no DNA yielded no transformants and ''B.subtilis'' transformed with 40ng and 400ng yielded about 10 transformants. | + | *The results showed that the ''B. subtilis'' transformed with no DNA yielded no transformants and ''B. subtilis'' transformed with 40ng and 400ng yielded about 10 transformants. |
*The protocol was carried out with two repeats and it was noticed that similar numbers of transformants were yielded for both repeats.}} | *The protocol was carried out with two repeats and it was noticed that similar numbers of transformants were yielded for both repeats.}} | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
'''Results'''<br> | '''Results'''<br> | ||
*We performed a transformation using the integration plasmid pDR110. Two repeats were carried out using this protocol. For the two repeats the competent cells were grown to an O.D.<sub>600</sub> of 1.5 and 1.8 and transformed with a range of DNA concentrations from 0 to 400ng of DNA. Transformants were selected with the antibiotic streptinomycin, the resistance of which is encoded by the pDR110. | *We performed a transformation using the integration plasmid pDR110. Two repeats were carried out using this protocol. For the two repeats the competent cells were grown to an O.D.<sub>600</sub> of 1.5 and 1.8 and transformed with a range of DNA concentrations from 0 to 400ng of DNA. Transformants were selected with the antibiotic streptinomycin, the resistance of which is encoded by the pDR110. | ||
- | *The results from this protocol were mixed, for the first repeat there were transformed colonies on the plate of ''B.subtilis'' transformed with no DNA. The most likely cause for this is that there was a contamination in preparation of these samples. For the second repeat no transformants was seen for the ''B.subtilis'' transformed with no DNA, showing that there was no contamination. | + | *The results from this protocol were mixed, for the first repeat there were transformed colonies on the plate of ''B. subtilis'' transformed with no DNA. The most likely cause for this is that there was a contamination in preparation of these samples. For the second repeat no transformants was seen for the ''B. subtilis'' transformed with no DNA, showing that there was no contamination. |
- | *Comparison of the different efficiencies of transformation between experiments showed that the number of transformants was highly variable. The cause for this is thought to be the settings for electroporation equipment. We able to control the voltage and the resistance but not the pulse length. Previous studies have shown that a pulse length below 5 msec gives low efficiency of transformation. A maximum efficiency is found for a pulse legnth of 10 msec. Between our two repeats we found a range of pulse lengths between 3-11 msec and as a result variability in the number of transformed ''B.subtilis''.}} | + | *Comparison of the different efficiencies of transformation between experiments showed that the number of transformants was highly variable. The cause for this is thought to be the settings for electroporation equipment. We able to control the voltage and the resistance but not the pulse length. Previous studies have shown that a pulse length below 5 msec gives low efficiency of transformation. A maximum efficiency is found for a pulse legnth of 10 msec. Between our two repeats we found a range of pulse lengths between 3-11 msec and as a result variability in the number of transformed ''B. subtilis''.}} |
Revision as of 01:55, 30 October 2008
|