"
Team:Michigan/Project/Modeling/Model1.html
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<div align='center'>[[Image:chart.png]] | <div align='center'>[[Image:chart.png]] | ||
| - | <b>Table 1</b><br> | + | <b>Table 1</b><br></div> |
| - | We see that if we increase our search range for the dissociation constant to 0 to .1, then we get a substantially less Ninfa index, illustrating the importance of having a tight binding between NifA and NifL. | + | We see that if we increase our search range for the dissociation constant to 0 to .1, then we get a substantially less Ninfa index, illustrating the importance of having a tight binding between NifA and NifL. |
| - | <div align='center'>[[Image:chart2.png]] | + | <div align='center'>[[Image:chart2.png]]<br> |
<b>Table 2</b> <br></div> | <b>Table 2</b> <br></div> | ||
We again see the necessity of a tight binding between NifA and NifL | We again see the necessity of a tight binding between NifA and NifL | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 23:42, 29 October 2008
|
|
|---|
|
Sequestillator Model 1: A simple modelAmrit 
Table 1We see that if we increase our search range for the dissociation constant to 0 to .1, then we get a substantially less Ninfa index, illustrating the importance of having a tight binding between NifA and NifL.  Table 2 We again see the necessity of a tight binding between NifA and NifL |
|---|
