"
Team:HKUSTers/Project
From 2008.igem.org
(→The Design) |
(→Final outcome) |
||
| Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
* Continous production of '''RFP''' if the polymease binds to the right of overlapped T7 promoter | * Continous production of '''RFP''' if the polymease binds to the right of overlapped T7 promoter | ||
| - | + | ||
[[Image:greenred.jpg|100px|left|frameless]]The signal output is shown by green or red fluorescent protein (GFP/RFP) respectively. | [[Image:greenred.jpg|100px|left|frameless]]The signal output is shown by green or red fluorescent protein (GFP/RFP) respectively. | ||
Revision as of 03:49, 30 October 2008
| Home | The Team | The Project | Parts to the Registry | Modelling | Notebook | Gallery |
The Design
"Making the dice"
We "tell" our cells to start making the "dice"--T7 polymease by applying a pulse of IPTG. IPTG can activate the araC/pBAD promoter which leads to transcription of T7 polymerase.
"Throwing the dice"
Reciprocal inhibiton
Then there are TetR and C1434 repressor repressor genes on both sides respectively. A repressor protein can be produced to interrupt transcription on the other side of the circuit.
For example, say, the T7 polymerase binds onto the promoter on the left side. The TetR repressor on the left, which was coded by TetR repressor gene, will bind to TetR operator on the right and repress transcription of right side of the promoter. Thus, the intial random event (binding of polymease) can be captured and amplified in a postive feedback circuit.
Final outcome
- Continous production of GFP if the polymease binds to the left of overlapped T7 promoter
- Continous production of RFP if the polymease binds to the right of overlapped T7 promoter
Construction details
Testing
| Name of test | Purpose | Circuit involved | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T7 polymease production test | Check the T7 polymease production circuit using IPTG as inducer and GFP as reporter |  | |
| GFP test | Check if the intact T7 promoter and GFP is functional |  | |
| Adjacent bidirectional promoters test | Evaluate if two promoters in opposite directions can function properly if they are placed adjacently |  | |
| Truncated promoter test | Stimulate the condition in the overlapped version, where the first two non-essential base pairs of cl434 promoter are altered. We want to know if the cl434 can still function under such conditions. |  | |
| Left/right induction test | To see whether the overlapping promoter can drive transcription of both directions |  |
Strain and vector used
- Strain: E. coli BBa_V1001 DH5a, with genotype
F-φ80dlacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169 deoR recA1 endA1 hsdR17(rk- mk+ phoA supE44 λ- thi-1 gyrA96 relA1)
- Vector: pUC18+ λ-InCh2
Integration system
We have chosen the λInCh system as the vehicle for intergration.
The success rate for recombination is about 1 in 1000 cells. Ampicillin is used to screen for the second recombination event and temperatute of 42 degree Celsius is used to screen for the third recombination event. (Such temperature deactivates the cl857 repressor and hence activates the harmful gene of λ-phage introduced in second recombination event, killing the host cells.)
The advantages of this approach include:
- No risk of >1 copy of target gene in our machine, so as to give a sharp output instead of "blurred" output caused by multiple copies
- Stable integration of a single copy of the construct DNA fragment
- Most ordinary E. coli strains and a variety of pBR322-derived Amp-resistant plasmids can be used
- λ-phage as the only specialized vector required
- Source:
Boyd D., Weiss D.S., Chen J.C., Beckwith J., Towards single-copy gene expression systems making gene cloning physiologically relevant: Lambda InCh, a simple Escherichia coli plasmid- chromosome shuttle system
(2000) Journal of Bacteriology, 182 (3), pp. 842-847.
