Team:The University of Alberta/15 July 2008

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Today)
Line 2: Line 2:
*Got sequencing back from Blue Ox in J61003 Transf.2 and Transf. 4. Both of them look good; Transf.2 looks "better" though because it has fewer mismatches.
*Got sequencing back from Blue Ox in J61003 Transf.2 and Transf. 4. Both of them look good; Transf.2 looks "better" though because it has fewer mismatches.
*Did PCR on Tryp again because no one can remember if it had been done successfully with the newest primers.
*Did PCR on Tryp again because no one can remember if it had been done successfully with the newest primers.
 +
**Ran portion of PCR out on 1% gel to confirm product. PCR purified the rest.
*Transformed the I0500+new vector ligation
*Transformed the I0500+new vector ligation

Revision as of 19:42, 15 July 2008

Today

  • Got sequencing back from Blue Ox in J61003 Transf.2 and Transf. 4. Both of them look good; Transf.2 looks "better" though because it has fewer mismatches.
  • Did PCR on Tryp again because no one can remember if it had been done successfully with the newest primers.
    • Ran portion of PCR out on 1% gel to confirm product. PCR purified the rest.
  • Transformed the I0500+new vector ligation