Team:BCCS-Bristol/Calendar-Notebook/14 July 2008

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(New page: Photographed and measured aspartate plates Results not too bad but would have liked better, was some significant movement more towards the aspartate (chemoattractant) Got some MC1000 stra...)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<html><link rel="stylesheet" href="http://www.chofski.co.uk/iGEM/bccs-igem.css" type="text/css"></html>
 +
__NOTOC__
 +
<div class="bccsNavBar">
 +
{|  align="center"
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:BCCS-Bristol|Home]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:BCCS-Bristol/Team|The Team]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:BCCS-Bristol/Project|The Project]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:BCCS-Bristol/Parts|Submitted Parts]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:BCCS-Bristol/Modeling|Modelling]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:BCCS-Bristol/Notebook|Wet Lab]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:BCCS-Bristol/Calendar|Calendar]]
 +
!align="center"|[[Team:BCCS-Bristol/Misc|Miscellaneous]]
 +
|}
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 +
Photographed and measured aspartate plates Results not too bad but would have liked better, was some significant movement more towards the aspartate (chemoattractant)
Photographed and measured aspartate plates Results not too bad but would have liked better, was some significant movement more towards the aspartate (chemoattractant)
Got some MC1000 strain today and decided to test the motility of this compared to MG1655 on overnight plates.
Got some MC1000 strain today and decided to test the motility of this compared to MG1655 on overnight plates.

Revision as of 13:57, 24 July 2008

Photographed and measured aspartate plates Results not too bad but would have liked better, was some significant movement more towards the aspartate (chemoattractant)

Got some MC1000 strain today and decided to test the motility of this compared to MG1655 on overnight plates.