Team:Paris/Modeling/f6

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(New page: 900px)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
[[Image:f6DCA.png|900px]]
+
[[Image:f6DCA.png|thumb]] At the steady-state, we have
 +
 
 +
<center>[[Image:FlhDCeq.jpg]]</center>
 +
and
 +
<center>[[Image:FliAeq.jpg]]</center>
 +
 
 +
so the expression
 +
 
 +
<center>[[Image:f6expr.jpg]]</center>
 +
 
 +
gives
 +
 
 +
<center>[[Image:f6FlhDC.jpg]]</center>
 +
and
 +
<center>[[Image:f6FliA.jpg]]</center>
 +
 
 +
and for ''calculated values of the TF'',
 +
 
 +
<center>[[Image:f6FlhDCCalc.jpg]]</center>
 +
and
 +
<center>[[Image:f6FliACalc.jpg]]</center>
 +
 
 +
<br><br>
 +
 
 +
{|border="1" style="text-align: center"
 +
|param
 +
|signification
 +
|unit
 +
|value
 +
|-
 +
|[expr(pFliL)]
 +
|expression rate of <br> pFliA '''with RBS E0032'''
 +
|nM.s<sup>-1</sup>
 +
|see [[Team:Paris/Modeling/Programs|"findparam"]] <br> need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the ''SUM''?
 +
|-
 +
|γ<sub>GFP</sub>
 +
|dilution-degradation rate <br> of GFP(mut3b)
 +
|s<sup>-1</sup>
 +
|ln(2)/3600
 +
|-
 +
|[GFP]
 +
|GFP concentration at steady-state
 +
|nM
 +
|need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the ''SUM''?
 +
|-
 +
|(''fluorescence'')
 +
|value of the observed fluorescence
 +
|au
 +
|need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the ''SUM''?
 +
|-
 +
|''conversion''
 +
|conversion ration between <br> fluorescence and concentration
 +
|nM.au<sup>-1</sup>
 +
|(1/79.429)
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
<br><br>
 +
 
 +
{|border="1" style="text-align: center"
 +
|param
 +
|signification <br> corresponding parameters in the [[Team:Paris/Modeling/Oscillations#Resulting_Equations|equations]]
 +
|unit
 +
|value
 +
|-
 +
|β<sub>53</sub>
 +
|production rate of FlhDC-pFliL '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>53</sub>
 +
|nM.s<sup>-1</sup>
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|(K<sub>47</sub>/{coef<sub>flhDC</sub>}<sup>n<sub>47</sub></sup>)
 +
|activation constant of FlhDC-pFliL <br> K<sub>47</sub>
 +
|nM<sup>n<sub>47</sub></sup>
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|n<sub>47</sub>
 +
|complexation order of FliA-pFliL <br> n<sub>47</sub>
 +
|no dimension
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
|β<sub>54</sub>
 +
|production rate of FliA-pFliL '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>54</sub>
 +
|nM.s<sup>-1</sup>
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|(K<sub>48</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>}<sup>n<sub>48</sub></sup>)
 +
|activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>48</sub>
 +
|nM<sup>n<sub>48</sub></sup>
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|n<sub>48</sub>
 +
|complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>48</sub>
 +
|no dimension
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
<br><br>
 +
 
 +
Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation
 +
 
 +
<center>[[Image:SumpFlgA.jpg]]</center>

Revision as of 16:15, 21 August 2008

F6DCA.png
At the steady-state, we have
FlhDCeq.jpg

and

FliAeq.jpg

so the expression

F6expr.jpg

gives

F6FlhDC.jpg

and

F6FliA.jpg

and for calculated values of the TF,

F6FlhDCCalc.jpg

and

F6FliACalc.jpg



param signification unit value
[expr(pFliL)] expression rate of
pFliA with RBS E0032
nM.s-1 see "findparam"
need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
γGFP dilution-degradation rate
of GFP(mut3b)
s-1 ln(2)/3600
[GFP] GFP concentration at steady-state nM need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
(fluorescence) value of the observed fluorescence au need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
conversion conversion ration between
fluorescence and concentration
nM.au-1 (1/79.429)



param signification
corresponding parameters in the equations
unit value
β53 production rate of FlhDC-pFliL with RBS E0032
β53
nM.s-1
(K47/{coefflhDC}n47) activation constant of FlhDC-pFliL
K47
nMn47
n47 complexation order of FliA-pFliL
n47
no dimension
β54 production rate of FliA-pFliL with RBS E0032
β54
nM.s-1
(K48/{coeffliA}n48) activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC
K48
nMn48
n48 complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC
n48
no dimension



Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation

SumpFlgA.jpg