"
Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Safety
From 2008.igem.org
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
The goal of our project is to obtain engineered bacteria, in order to mimic logic gates and circuits. The proteins and the protein/DNA interactions used to achieve this are taken directly from basic bacterial or bacteriophage-specific functions, without any toxin or pathogenic factor. | The goal of our project is to obtain engineered bacteria, in order to mimic logic gates and circuits. The proteins and the protein/DNA interactions used to achieve this are taken directly from basic bacterial or bacteriophage-specific functions, without any toxin or pathogenic factor. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| - | Our engineered E. coli, moreover, belong to a lab-specific strain, TOP10, which is free of toxin- or resistance-containing plasmids; so, if handled properly and not dispersed | + | Our engineered E. coli, moreover, belong to a lab-specific strain, TOP10, which is free of toxin- or resistance-containing plasmids; so, if handled properly and not dispersed in the environment, they don’t present any biological risk for researchers and public health. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
''What does our biosafety responsible think of our project?'' | ''What does our biosafety responsible think of our project?'' | ||
Revision as of 23:01, 3 June 2008
 Home
|  The Team
|  The Project
|  Biological Safety
|  Parts Submitted to the Registry
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Dry Lab
|  Wet Lab
|  Modeling
|  Protocols
|  Activity Notebook
|
Safety issues
Does our project raise concerns about researcher, public or environmental safety?
The goal of our project is to obtain engineered bacteria, in order to mimic logic gates and circuits. The proteins and the protein/DNA interactions used to achieve this are taken directly from basic bacterial or bacteriophage-specific functions, without any toxin or pathogenic factor.
Our engineered E. coli, moreover, belong to a lab-specific strain, TOP10, which is free of toxin- or resistance-containing plasmids; so, if handled properly and not dispersed in the environment, they don’t present any biological risk for researchers and public health.
What does our biosafety responsible think of our project?
The biosafety board in our lab, and particularly the responsible, agreed with our safety considerations and approved the project, without any particular restriction, apart from routinely-used safety procedures.
Other than E. coli and biological risk, are there any sources of chemical/physical risk??
During our operations, we handle IPTG, ethidium bromide and UV rays. About IPTG and ethidium bromide, we handle them carefully under a dedicated hood; about UV rays, upon gel evaluation, we use a protective glass on the lamp and we also wear protective glasses. So, physical and chemical risk, in this way, are minimized.
