Team:Paris/Modeling/f6

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 57: Line 57:
|comments
|comments
|-
|-
-
|β<sub>13</sub>
+
|β<sub>54</sub>
-
|production rate of FliA-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>13</sub>
+
|production rate of FlhDC-pFlgA '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>54</sub>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|(K<sub>12</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>})
+
|(K<sub>48</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>})
-
|activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>12</sub>
+
|activation constant of FlhDC-pFlgA <br> K<sub>48</sub>
|nM
|nM
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|n<sub>12</sub>
+
|n<sub>48</sub>
-
|complexation order of FliA-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>12</sub>
+
|complexation order of FlhDC-pFlgA <br> n<sub>48</sub>
|no dimension
|no dimension
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|β<sub>2</sub>
+
|β<sub>55</sub>
-
|production rate of OmpR-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>2</sub>
+
|production rate of FliA-pFlgA '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>55</sub>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|(K<sub>22</sub>/{coef<sub>omp</sub>})
+
|(K<sub>49</sub>/{coef<sub>omp</sub>})
-
|activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>22</sub>
+
|activation constant of FliA-pFlgA <br> K<sub>49</sub>
|nM
|nM
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
-
|n<sub>22</sub>
+
|n<sub>49</sub>
-
|complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>22</sub>
+
|complexation order of FliA-pFlgA <br> n<sub>49</sub>
|no dimension
|no dimension
|
|

Revision as of 22:30, 20 October 2008

F6DCA.png

We have [FlhDC] = {coefflhDC}expr(pTet) = {coefflhDC} ƒ1([aTc]i)

and [FliA] = {coefFliA}expr(pBad) = {coefFliA} ƒ2([arab]i)

So, at steady-states,

F6.jpg


param signification unit value comments
[expr(pFlhDC)] expression rate of
pFlhDC with RBS E0032
nM.min-1 need for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [aTc]i
and for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [arab]i
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
γGFP dilution-degradation rate
of GFP(mut3b)
min-1 0.0198
[GFP] GFP concentration at steady-state nM need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
(fluorescence) value of the observed fluorescence au need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
conversion conversion ratio between
fluorescence and concentration
nM.au-1 (1/79.429)



param signification
corresponding parameters in the equations
unit value comments
β54 production rate of FlhDC-pFlgA with RBS E0032
β54
nM.min-1
(K48/{coeffliA}) activation constant of FlhDC-pFlgA
K48
nM
n48 complexation order of FlhDC-pFlgA
n48
no dimension
β55 production rate of FliA-pFlgA with RBS E0032
β55
nM.min-1
(K49/{coefomp}) activation constant of FliA-pFlgA
K49
nM
n49 complexation order of FliA-pFlgA
n49
no dimension



Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation

SumpFlgA.jpg