Team:ETH Zurich/Tools/Automated Wiki
From 2008.igem.org
(→How to overcome this situation) |
(→The automated wiki) |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
[[Image:Auto wiki shot.png|center|thumb|500px|Page editing with the Automated Wiki]] | [[Image:Auto wiki shot.png|center|thumb|500px|Page editing with the Automated Wiki]] | ||
- | For an example of a page generated with the automated wiki click [https://2008.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Wet_Lab/Protocoll here] | + | For an example of a page generated with the automated wiki, click [https://2008.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Wet_Lab/Protocoll here] |
+ | |||
== Why we didn't use it in the end == | == Why we didn't use it in the end == | ||
There were two reasons why we didn't use the automated wiki in the end. | There were two reasons why we didn't use the automated wiki in the end. |
Revision as of 00:21, 28 October 2008
MotivationAt the beginning of our project planning phase we were also thinking about how to deal with the wiki.
One major shortcoming showed up when we were browsing the wikis of previous iGEM competitions - a lot of them simply didn't work anymore. The problem is that large parts of the old wikis are stored on external servers- e.g. JavaScript menus that are stored on students' private homepages. As you can see, the .js file is stored on an external server. As soon as this file is gone, the whole wiki page won't work anymore, because the navigation is gone. And if you browse through wikis of even earlier years, you can see that this has already happened to a lot of pages. This year's situationWhen we then started to think of ways how to design the wiki, it turned out that the persons responsible for this wiki are aware of the situation- embedding external content into a wiki page did not seem to work anymore. While this solved the problem of missing content, it gave rise a new problem. Wiki syntax is very simple and therefore easy to handle. While this appears as a benefit when editing pages, it goes along with a lack of flexibility concerning design- or a lot of work if you want to have a nice design anyways. The wiki syntax makes it harder to separate design and content- like it is the case for our wiki page right now.
Since we have a lot of people responsible for the content and only few work on the design, we agreed on editing pages like this:
<!-- PUT THE PAGE CONTENT AFTER THIS LINE. THANKS :) -->
How to overcome this situationWhile the reasons why external content should not be allowed on the wiki were obvious, we still didn't want to settle with "just" using the regular wiki editing. Therefore, we had the idea to use some kind of software to overcome the shortcomings listed above. We wanted to introduce a "middle man" who perforems editing tasks for the user and create a division of content and syntax while maintaining wiki only syntax on the MIT wiki site. The automated wikiFor an example of a page generated with the automated wiki, click here Why we didn't use it in the endThere were two reasons why we didn't use the automated wiki in the end.
DownloadMedia:ETH Auto wiki.zip Keep in mind that the development of this tool stopped in the middle of the project. However, you might be able to use some ideas/parts of it. |