Team:Johns Hopkins/Notebook/GROUP 2: MATa Specific-promoters

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(GROUP 2: MATa Specific-promoters)
(GROUP 2: MATa Specific-promoters)
Line 3: Line 3:
== GROUP 2: MATa Specific-promoters ==
== GROUP 2: MATa Specific-promoters ==
-
   September 2: Transformation into a Cam BioBrick was completed, and the restriction digestion of
+
   Date: September 7, 2008
-
   the Biobricks from the pGEM vector were checked, comparing the inserts intended to be ligated to
+
   Status report by: Allison and Nate
-
  the Kan Biobrick vector and the inserts intended to be ligated to the Cam Biobrick vector;
+
   Part no.: BBa_K110008 -> BBa_K110016
-
   notice that the old inserts are either too faint to see or are not there:
+
   Part Description: A promoters: MFA1 (L+R) and Ste2 (R+L), respectively.   Since the restriction digestions have been unclear as to whether or not the ligation
-
  [[Media:lanes2thru5OldDigest0816NewDigest0816.jpg|lanes2thru5OldDigest0816NewDigest0816]]
+
-
  Lanes: 1 (2-log ladder), 2 BBa_K110008 old, 3 BBa_K110016 old, 4 BBa_K110008 new, 5 BBa_K110016
+
-
   new, 6 (2-log ladder)
+
-
  A restriction digestion with EcoRI and PstI was done to check for the insert after ligated and
+
-
  transformed with the Cam Biobrick vector: [[Media:090308digest08_16cam.jpg|090308digest08_16_cam]]
+
-
  Lanes: 1 (old aliquot of 2-log ladder), 2 (new aliquot of 2-log ladder), 3 skip, 4 BBa_K110008,
+
-
   5 skip, 6 BBa_K110016  September 7: Since the restriction digestions have been unclear as to whether or not the ligation
+
   of MFA1 and STE2 into the Cam BioBrick vector was successful, another transformation was done
   of MFA1 and STE2 into the Cam BioBrick vector was successful, another transformation was done
   into the Cam Biobrick vector, restriction digestions on the previous mini prep from the 1st
   into the Cam Biobrick vector, restriction digestions on the previous mini prep from the 1st
Line 25: Line 18:
   The restriction digestion did not show the insert, while pcr showed a band of the expected size
   The restriction digestion did not show the insert, while pcr showed a band of the expected size
   in two of the four samples.
   in two of the four samples.
 +
 +
  Date: September 2, 2008
 +
  Status report by: Allison and Nate
 +
  Part no.: BBa_K110008 -> BBa_K110016
 +
  Part Description: A promoters: MFA1 (L+R) and Ste2 (R+L), respectively.  Transformation into a Cam BioBrick was completed, and the restriction digestion of
 +
  the Biobricks from the pGEM vector were checked, comparing the inserts intended to be ligated to
 +
  the Kan Biobrick vector and the inserts intended to be ligated to the Cam Biobrick vector;
 +
  notice that the old inserts are either too faint to see or are not there:
 +
  [[Media:lanes2thru5OldDigest0816NewDigest0816.jpg|lanes2thru5OldDigest0816NewDigest0816]]
 +
  Lanes: 1 (2-log ladder), 2 BBa_K110008 old, 3 BBa_K110016 old, 4 BBa_K110008 new, 5 BBa_K110016
 +
  new, 6 (2-log ladder)
 +
  A restriction digestion with EcoRI and PstI was done to check for the insert after ligated and
 +
  transformed with the Cam Biobrick vector: [[Media:090308digest08_16cam.jpg|090308digest08_16_cam]]
 +
  Lanes: 1 (old aliquot of 2-log ladder), 2 (new aliquot of 2-log ladder), 3 skip, 4 BBa_K110008,
 +
  5 skip, 6 BBa_K110016.
   Date: August 19, 2008
   Date: August 19, 2008

Revision as of 01:20, 29 October 2008

GROUP 2: MATa Specific-promoters

 Date: September 7, 2008
 Status report by: Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110008 -> BBa_K110016
 Part Description: A promoters: MFA1 (L+R) and Ste2 (R+L), respectively.   Since the restriction digestions have been unclear as to whether or not the ligation
 of MFA1 and STE2 into the Cam BioBrick vector was successful, another transformation was done
 into the Cam Biobrick vector, restriction digestions on the previous mini prep from the 1st
 transformation and 2nd transformation completed, as well as PCR on the mini preps using the
 corresponding primers for BBa_K11008 and BBa_K110016. In the gel: after the 2 log ladder, the
 next for lanes have the restriction digestion products (approx 500 ng of plasmid each) and the
 second four lanes are pcr products in the following order: 08 (1st cam transformation) 16 (1st
 cam transformation) 08 (2nd transformation) 16 (2nd transformation) for both the restriction
 digestion and the pcr. The final lane was a control used in the pcr, unrelated to the project.
 090708digestpcr0816
 The restriction digestion did not show the insert, while pcr showed a band of the expected size
 in two of the four samples.
 Date: September 2, 2008
 Status report by: Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110008 -> BBa_K110016
 Part Description: A promoters: MFA1 (L+R) and Ste2 (R+L), respectively.   Transformation into a Cam BioBrick was completed, and the restriction digestion of
 the Biobricks from the pGEM vector were checked, comparing the inserts intended to be ligated to
 the Kan Biobrick vector and the inserts intended to be ligated to the Cam Biobrick vector;
 notice that the old inserts are either too faint to see or are not there:
 lanes2thru5OldDigest0816NewDigest0816
 Lanes: 1 (2-log ladder), 2 BBa_K110008 old, 3 BBa_K110016 old, 4 BBa_K110008 new, 5 BBa_K110016
 new, 6 (2-log ladder)
 A restriction digestion with EcoRI and PstI was done to check for the insert after ligated and
 transformed with the Cam Biobrick vector: 090308digest08_16_cam
 Lanes: 1 (old aliquot of 2-log ladder), 2 (new aliquot of 2-log ladder), 3 skip, 4 BBa_K110008,
 5 skip, 6 BBa_K110016.
 Date: August 19, 2008
 Status report by: Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110008 -> BBa_K110016
 Part Description: A promoters: MFA1 (L+R) and Ste2 (R+L), respectively. 
 Sequences were analyzed. BBa_K110016 had a perfect clone. Since there is not much miniprep left,
 a transformation was done to generate more clones with the correct sequence. BBa_K110008 had one
 mutation. Another transformation into a Kan BioBrick vector was attempted but was unsuccessful.
 Date: August 12, 2008
 Status report by: Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K11008 -> BBa_K110016
 Part Description: A promoters MFA1 (L+R) and Ste2 (R+L)
 Two more minipreps were completed. DNA concentrations were much higher (>150 ng/ul).
 Date: August 5, 2008
 Status report by: Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110008 -> BBa_K110016
 Part Description: A promoters: MFA1 (L+R) and Ste2 (R+L), respectively.
 Sequences were analyzed. BBa_K110016 had a perfect clone. Since there is not much
 miniprep left, a transformation will be done to generate more clones with the 
 correct sequence. BBa_K110008 had one mutation; additional minipreps from other clones
 are ready to send off for sequencing, although the DNA concentrations are low. Colonies
 can be picked and overnight cultures grown
 for another round of minipreps.
 Date: July 29, 2008
 Status report by: Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110008 -> BBa_K110016
 Part Description: A promoters: MFA1 (L+R) and Ste2 (R+L), respectively.
 Two samples of mini preps from MFA1 and Ste2 were sent off for sequencing at the end of last week.
 Results will follow soon.
 Date: July 22, 2008
 Status report by Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110016
 Part Description: Ste2 (R+L)
 Part Location: in a labeled box, second shelf from the top, -20 degrees C refrigerator next to 
  front door; plates at 4 degrees
 PCR successful? Yes
 Cloning of PCR product successful: Yes (approx 20 white colonies on one plate)
 Joining of validated part to adjacent part(s) status: not done
 Problems to be solved:
 Current status of this part: 12 mini preps and the restriction digestion were completed;
 preparing to send 3 samples to be sequenced
 [http://www.jhu.edu/iGEM/Group2:MATaSpecificPromoters/2008-7-22.Restriction%20Digests%20of%20BBa_K1100...%2008%20&%2016.Allison%20Suarez%20and%20Nate% 20Sotuyo%20.html Restriction Digests of BBa_K1100... 08 & 16]
 Date: July 22, 2008
 Status report by Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110008
 Part Description: MFA1 (L+R)
 Part Location: same as above, plates are at 4 degrees refrigerator near front door
 PCR successful? Yes 
 (BAD LINK)
 Cloning of PCR product of successful? Yes (approx 60 white colonies between two plates)
 Sequencing of cloned PCR product successful: not done
 Joining of validated part to adjacent part(s) status: not done
 Problems to be solved:
 Current status of this part: 12 mini preps and the restriction digestion were completed;
 preparing to send 3 samples to be sequenced
 [http://www.jhu.edu/iGEM/Group2:MATaSpecificPromoters/2008-7-22.Restriction%20Digests%20of%20BBa_K1100...%2008%20&%2016.Allison%20Suarez%20and%20Nate%20Sotuyo%20.html Restriction Digests of BBa_K1100... 08 & 16]
 Date: July 14, 2008
 Status report by Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110016
 Part Description: Ste2 (R+L)
 Part Location: in a labeled box, second shelf from the top, -20 degrees C refrigerator next to 
 front door; plates at 4 degrees
 PCR successful? Yes
 Cloning of PCR product successful: There were many blue colonies (similar to the plate of BB_K110008)
 Sequencing of cloned PCR product successful: not done
 Joining of validated part to adjacent part(s) status: not done
 Problems to be solved: Ligation
 Current status of this part: plates are at 4 degrees; another ligation/transformation 
 will be completed soon
 Date: July 14, 2008
 Status report by Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110008
 Part Description: MFA1 (L+R)
 Part Location: same as above, plates are at 4 degrees refrigerator near front door
 PCR successful? Yes
 Cloning of PCR product of successful? There were mainly light blue colonies 
 (only a couple white colonies)
 Sequencing of cloned PCR product successful: not done
 Joining of validated part to adjacent part(s) status: not done
 Problems to be solved: Ligation
 Current status of this part: plates are at 4 degrees; another ligation/transformation 
 will be completed soon
 Date: July 10, 2008
 Status report by Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110016
 Part Description: Ste2 (R+L)
 Part Location: in a labeled box, second shelf from the top, -20
 degrees C refrigerator next to front door
 PCR successful? Yes
 [http://www.jhu.edu/iGEM/Group2:MATaSpecificPromoters/2008-7-22.BioBricks%208%20and%2016.Allison%20Suarez%20and%20Nate%20Sotuyo%20.html BioBricks 8 and 16]
 [http://www.jhu.edu/iGEM/Group2:MATaSpecificPromoters/2008-7-22.BioBricks%208%20and%2016%20Using%20Constant%20Annealing.Allison%20Suarez%20and%20Nate%20Sotuyo%20.html BioBricks 8 and 16 Using Constant Annealing]
 [http://www.jhu.edu/iGEM/Group2:MATaSpecificPromoters/2008-7-22.Short%202Way%20Stop,%20Alpha%20Promoters,%20&%20Sapphire%20FP.Allison%20Suarez%20and%20Nate%20Sotuyo%20.html Short 2Way Stop, Alpha Promoters, & Sapphire FP]
 Cloning of PCR product successful: in progress
 Sequencing of cloned PCR product successful: not done
 Joining of validated part to adjacent part(s) status: not done
 Problems to be solved: to be determined
 Current status of this part: Both PCR protocols (touchdown and second
 PCR with constant annealing temperature) produced product of the
 correct size. BBa_K110016 was used as a control in the second PCR with
 BBa_K110008.
 Date: July 10, 2008
 Status report by Allison and Nate
 Part no.: BBa_K110008
 Part Description: MFA1 (L+R)
 Part Location: in a labeled box, second shelf from the top, -20
 degrees C refrigerator next to front door
 PCR successful? Yes
 [http://www.jhu.edu/iGEM/Group2:MATaSpecificPromoters/2008-7-22.BioBricks%208%20and%2016.Allison%20Suarez%20and%20Nate%20Sotuyo%20.html BioBricks 8 and 16]
 [http://www.jhu.edu/iGEM/Group2:MATaSpecificPromoters/2008-7-22.BioBricks%208%20and%2016%20Using%20Constant%20Annealing.Allison%20Suarez%20and%20Nate%20Sotuyo%20.html BioBricks 8 and 16 Using Constant Annealing]
 [http://www.jhu.edu/iGEM/Group2:MATaSpecificPromoters/2008-7-22.Short%202Way%20Stop,%20Alpha%20Promoters,%20&%20Sapphire%20FP.Allison%20Suarez%20and%20Nate%20Sotuyo%20.html Short 2Way Stop, Alpha Promoters, & Sapphire FP]
 Cloning of PCR product successful: in progress
 Sequencing of cloned PCR product successful: not done
 Joining of validated part to adjacent part(s) status: not done
 Problems to be solved: to be determined
 Current status of this part: PCR was being troubleshooted, appeared to
 have good results with regular PCR protocol (not touchdown) in which
 there was a constant annealing temperature of 55 degrees C - see gel