Team:Edinburgh/Modelling

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 22:25, 29 October 2008

Process Considerations

In developing a commercial version of the 'Edinburgh Process' for conversion of cellulose to starch, the following points must be considered:

Some of the glucose released by cellulose hydrolysis will be used by the 'Micromaize' organisms for growth and enzyme synthesis. We therefore envisage use of an aerobic process (rather than an anaerobic process, as envisaged by most developers of cellulose bioconversion processes) to minimise the amount of glucose which is used in this way, leaving the maximum amount of glucose available for conversion to starch.
Aerobic processes are more expensive to operate than anaerobic processes due to the greater cost of aeration, mixing, and cooling. However, cellulose degradation is intrinsically slower than use of soluble substrates, so the power requirements for aeration and mixing are expected to be much lower than for a typical aerobic process, and it may be possible to use a non-traditional bioreactor such as a continuous tower reactor (airlift or pressure cycle reactor)or a rotating drum device, rather than a more usual (and more expensive) aerated stirred tank reactor.
Since starch is an insoluble product (unlike glucose, the more usual target product of cellulose bioconversion processes), it can be recovered simply by harvesting and drying the cells. Further processing requirements will be dictated by the size of starch grain that can be achieved in bacterial cells. Starch granules are generally much larger than glycogen granules, but since bacteria do not naturally produce starch, we cannot accurately estimate this until some experimental evidence is available.
Since starch is insoluble, it does not exert osmotic pressure and should not cause product inhibition, unlike glucose. We therefore hope that it will accumulate to much higher levels than glucose, decreasing downstream processing costs.

Modelling

Equation of fermentation reaction

CH1.8O0.5N0.2 + 0.41915O2 = 0.62CH1.77O0.49N0.24 + 0.0512NH3 + 0.2745H2O + 0.38CO2

Production Process Model

Below we show an outline of a possible process for large scale production of 'Micromaize' from cellulosic waste material.

Some useful sources for information on large scale microbial processes in general, and processes for polysaccharide/food production specifically, include:

H.-J. Rehm and G. Reed. Biotechnology, Vol.4: Measuring, Modelling and Control.
Glazer, A.N. and Nikaido, H. 1995. Microbial Biotechnology: Fundamntals of applied microbiology. W.H. Freeman Co., NY.
Angold, R., Beech, G., and Taggart, G. 1989. Food Biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Crueger, W., and Crueger, A. 1990. Biotechnology: a textbook of industrial microbiology. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA.
Ratledge, C., and Kristiansen, B. (eds). 2006. Basic Biotechnology, 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, UK.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 ===Production Process Model===
-Below we show an outline of a possible process for large scale production of 'Micromaize' from cellulosic waste material. Some useful sources for information on large scale microbial processes in general, and processes for polysaccharide/food production specifically, include:
+Below we show an outline of a possible process for large scale production of 'Micromaize' from cellulosic waste material.
+[[Image:Produce model.jpg]]
+Some useful sources for information on large scale microbial processes in general, and processes for polysaccharide/food production specifically, include:
 * H.-J. Rehm and G. Reed. Biotechnology, Vol.4: Measuring, Modelling and Control.
@@ Line 27: / Line 34: @@
 * Crueger, W., and Crueger, A. 1990. Biotechnology: a textbook of industrial microbiology. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA.
 * Ratledge, C., and Kristiansen, B. (eds). 2006. Basic Biotechnology, 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, UK.
-[[Image:Produce model.jpg]]