Team:Michigan/Project/Modeling/Model1.html

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 17: Line 17:
<b>Table 1</b><br>
<b>Table 1</b><br>
-
We see that if we increase our search range for the dissociation constant to 0 to .1, then we get a substantially less Ninfa index, illustrating the importance of having a tight binding between NifA and NifL.
+
We see that if we increase our search range for the dissociation constant to 0 to .1, then we get a substantially less Ninfa index, illustrating the importance of having a tight binding between NifA and NifL.</div>
-
[[Image:chart2.png]]
+
<div align='center'>[[Image:chart2.png]]
<b>Table 2</b> <br></div>
<b>Table 2</b> <br></div>
We again see the necessity of a tight binding between NifA and NifL
We again see the necessity of a tight binding between NifA and NifL
|}
|}

Revision as of 23:41, 29 October 2008


Michigan iGEM website header.jpg

HOME THE TEAM THE PROJECT REGISTRY PARTS NOTEBOOK


Sequestillator Model 1: A simple model

Amrit

Chart.png

Table 1

We see that if we increase our search range for the dissociation constant to 0 to .1, then we get a substantially less Ninfa index, illustrating the importance of having a tight binding between NifA and NifL.
Chart2.png Table 2

We again see the necessity of a tight binding between NifA and NifL

Retrieved from "http://2008.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Project/Modeling/Model1.html"