Team:Paris/Modeling/f5

From 2008.igem.org

Revision as of 15:51, 21 August 2008 by Hugo (Talk | contribs)
F5DCA.png
At the steady-state, we have
FlhDCeq.jpg

and

FliAeq.jpg

so the expression

F5expr.jpg

gives

F5FlhDC.jpg

and

F5FliA.jpg

and for calculated values of the TF,

F5FlhDCCalc.jpg

and

F5FliACalc.jpg



param signification unit value
[expr(pFliA)] expression rate of
pFliA with RBS E0032
nM.s-1 see "findparam"
need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
γGFP dilution-degradation rate
of GFP(mut3b)
s-1 ln(2)/3600
[GFP] GFP concentration at steady-state nM need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
(fluorescence) value of the observed fluorescence au need for 20 + 20 measures
and 5x5 measures for the SUM?
conversion conversion ration between
fluorescence and concentration
nM.au-1 (1/79.429)



param signification
corresponding parameters in the equations
unit value
β5 production rate of FlhDC-pFliA with RBS E0032
β5
nM.s-1
(K3/{coefflhDC}n3) activation constant of FlhDC-pFliA
K3
nMn3
n3 complexation order of FliA-pFliA
n3
no dimension
β13 production rate of FliA-pFliA with RBS E0032
β13
nM.s-1
(K9/{coeffliA}n9) activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC
K9
nMn9
n9 complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC
n19
no dimension



Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation

SumpFliL.jpg