Team:Paris/Modeling/f5
From 2008.igem.org
At the steady-state, we haveand
so the expression
gives
and
and for calculated values of the TF,
and
param | signification | unit | value |
[expr(pFliL)] | expression rate of pFliL with RBS E0032 | nM.s-1 | see "findparam" need for 20 + 20 measures and 5x5 measures for the SUM? |
γGFP | dilution-degradation rate of GFP(mut3b) | min-1 | 0.0198 |
[GFP] | GFP concentration at steady-state | nM | need for 20 + 20 measures and 5x5 measures for the SUM? |
(fluorescence) | value of the observed fluorescence | au | need for 20 + 20 measures and 5x5 measures for the SUM? |
conversion | conversion ration between fluorescence and concentration | nM.au-1 | (1/79.429) |
param | signification corresponding parameters in the equations | unit | value |
β53 | production rate of FlhDC-pFliL with RBS E0032 β53 | nM.min-1 | |
(K47/{coefflhDC}) | activation constant of FlhDC-pFliL K47 | nM | |
n47 | complexation order of FlhDC-pFliL n47 | no dimension | |
β54 | production rate of FliA-pFliL with RBS E0032 β54 | nM.min-1 | |
(K48/{coeffliA}) | activation constant of FliA-pFliL K48 | nM | |
n48 | complexation order of FliA-pFliL n48 | no dimension |
Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation