Characterization of the existing LacI-GFP part (BBa_R0010)

Results obtained at 25°C (Graph 4-1)

From the graph 4-1 of RFU vs. Lactose Concentration for the experiment conducted at 25°C, we could deduce the following:

1) For all concentration of Lactose (0 to 10mM), there were initial dips in RFU readings. This could be due the cells accommodating to a environment that was of a different medium and temperature. As previously, the cells were incubated at 37°C and in LB medium, but during the RFU measurement, the temperature was 42° and M9 medium was used instead as it would not auto-fluoresce.

2) After about 90 minutes, the RFU readings start to increase for all concentration of Lactose. This could be due to the fact that the cells were fully accommodated, and were starting to show the effects of the Lactose, the activator of the LacI-GFP promoter, thus producing GFP proteins which led to more RFU measured.

3) A strange observation was observed, as more readings were taken over time, the effect of Lactose concentration was more on cells that were subjected to lower Lactose concentration. As shown in Graph 4-1, we could see that the RFU readings for lower concentration of Lactose were higher than that for higher concentration of Lactose. This puzzling result could be due to the cells being overwhelmed by the high amounts of Lactose.

4) After approximately 400 minutes, the RFU readings generally become constant with slight fluctuations observed. This could be due the cells reaching saturation where the lactose in the environment would not further increase the amount of GFP protein formed. This could also be due the cell reaching stationary phrase, where the cells would not be actively affected by the lactose in the environment.

Results obtained at 37°C (Graph 4-2)

From the graph 4-2 of RFU vs. Lactose Concentration for the experiment conducted at 37°C, we could deduce the following:

1) For all concentration of Lactose (0 to 10mM), there were initial dips in RFU readings. This could be due the cells accommodating to a environment that was of a different medium. As previously, the cells were incubated in LB medium, but during the RFU measurement, M9 medium was used instead as it would not auto-fluoresce.

2) After about 90 minutes, the RFU readings start to increase for all concentration of Lactose. This could be due to the fact that the cells were fully accommodated, and were starting to show the effects of the Lactose, the activator of the LacI promoter, thus producing GFP proteins which led to more RFU measured.

3) As more readings were taken over time, the effect of Lactose concentration was more on cells that were subjected to higher Lactose concentration. As shown in Graph 4-2, we could see that the RFU readings for higher concentration of Lactose were higher than that for lower concentration of Lactose. This result could be due the increase in amount of lactose directly caused an increase in LacI promoter activity, which further results in more GFP protein formed and an increase in RFU readings measured.

4) After approximately 400 minutes, the RFU readings generally become constant with slight fluctuations observed, similar to the results found in 25°C (Graph 4-1). This could be due the cells reaching saturation, where lactose in the environment would not further increase the amount of GFP protein formed. This could also be due the cell reaching stationary phrase, where the cells would not be actively affected by the lactose in the environment.

Results obtained at 42°C (Graph 4-3)

From the graph 4-3 of RFU vs. Lactose Concentration for the experiment conducted at 42°C, we could deduce the following:

1) For all concentration of Lactose (0 to 10mM), there were initial dips in RFU readings. This could be due the cells accommodating to a environment that was of a different medium and temperature. As previously, the cells were incubated at 37°C and in LB medium, but during the RFU measurement, the temperature was 42° and M9 medium was used instead as it would not auto-fluoresce.

2) The normalized RFU readings for 42°C (ranging from -15 to 40) were generally lower than those obtained for 25°C (ranging from -50 to 150) and for 37°C (ranging from 0 to 500). This small range increased could be due to the relatively low activity when the temperature was at 42°C. The low activity showed that at 42°C, the condition was not conducive for the cells to express the GFP protein.

3) After about 50 minutes, the RFU readings start to increase for all concentration of Lactose. This could be due to the fact that the cells had started to accommodate, and were starting to show the effects of the Lactose, the activator of the LacI promoter, thus producing GFP proteins which led to more RFU measured.

4) As more readings were taken over time, the effect of Lactose concentration was NOT significantly more for cells that were subjected to higher Lactose concentration. As shown in Graph 4-3, we could see that the RFU readings for higher concentration of Lactose were about the same to those readings for lower concentration of Lactose. This result could be due the increase in amount of lactose which directly caused an increase in LacI promoter activity. However the effect of temperature was more dominant, as only a small increase of RFU readings were measured.

5) After approximately 400 minutes, the RFU readings showed trends of increasing, though the increase was minimal. This was not similar to the results obtained in 25°C (Graph 4-1) and 37°C (Graph 4-2). This could be due the cells not reaching saturation yet and the lactose in the environment caused the increased in amount of GFP protein formed.