Team:Heidelberg/Parts/Characterization

From 2008.igem.org

Revision as of 09:36, 28 October 2008

Part Characterization

lambda cI (BBa_K150004)

cI protein

Bacteriophage λ cI exists as an inactive monomer at very low concentrations (<10-9 M) but forms functional homodimers at physiological concentrations that remarkably lack a global symmetry [1]. It consists of 236 amino acids, although 237 amino acids are translated since the initiator methionine is removed by the host. Although λ cI is commonly called a repressor because of its negative regulatory functions at oL and oR, cI protein acts also as a positive regulator of gene transcription and can activate transcription of its own gene through the pRM promoter in bacteriophage λ. In genetic and biochemical studies as well as through the crystal structure it has been shown, that the carboxy-terminal domain of the cI protein contains the major sites for dimerization and oligomerization [2, 3]. The cI protein has a two-domain structure with an N-terminal portion involved in DNA binding, and a C-terminal domain that mediates dimer formation, dimer-dimer interaction, and self-cleavage. The self-cleavage reaction is triggert when the lysogenic cell suffers DNA damage and depends upon an activated form of the bacterial RecA protein [2, 4-6]. The ‘hinge region’ connecting both domains contains a conserved site that can undergo this RecA-mediated autodigestion resulting in inactivation of the repressor by separating the N-terminal from the C-terminal domain of the repressor [4, 7]. The cI protein binds symmetrically to DNA, so that each amino-terminal domain contacts a similar set of bases. The N-terminal DNA-binding domain is made up of 5 α-helices of which helix 2 and helix 3 (the helix-turn-helix motif) are involved in nucleotide sequence specific DNA recognition and binding to the major groove of DNA [8-11].

Function of cI protein in bacteriophage λ

The cI repressor in bacterophage λ is the key component of a ‘genetic switch’ that enables the phage to transition from lysogenic growth to lytic development. The cI protein binds the oL and oR operator which overlap with the pL and pR promoter (the lytic promoters). This binding allows the maintenance of the lysogenic state to be governed by cI alone. As soon as cI is inactivated, e.g., by the SOS response after UV damage or other agents that cause DNA damage, the lytic development follows [12]. The two operators oL and oR both contain three binding sites for cI protein. In each case, site 1 (i.e. oL1 and oR1) has a ~10-fold greater affinity than the other sites for cI protein. The repressor, therefore, always binds first to oL1 and oR1 and than binds to the other sites in the operator in a cooperative manner [13, 14]. The carboxy-terminal domains of the repressor dimmers mediate this cooperativity which improves the specificity and strength of the cI DNA binding, enabling strong repression of the lytic promoters [15]. Furthermore, another cooperative interaction between these two sets of tetramers bound to oL and oR, 2.4 kb apart, leads to the formation of a DNA loop held by a cI octamer, i.e. two interacting tetramers, that enhances repression of the early promoters [16-19]. In this DNA-multiprotein complex, the cI dimer bound at oR2 represses pR and at the same time also stimulates pRM transcription, thus activating cI synthesis in a repressed prophage by a positive autoregulatory loop [20-22]. As the cI concentration increases because of pRM activation, two additional cI dimers are recruited to bind oL3 and oR3 to further stabilize the oL – oR loop. In this context, cI overexpression is prevented by the binding of cI to oR3 which represses pRM [17, 19]. This positive and negative autoregulation at pRM by cI ensures a narrow range of cI repressor level to be maintained, which is optimum for stable lysogeny but is at the same time adjusted low enough for efficient induction of the lysogen. By repressing transcription from the pR promoter not only expression of genes in that operon is inhibited but also phage DNA replication by preventing transcriptional activation of λ ori, the site where phage DNA replication is initiated [23]. Even if O and P functions are present this inhibition occurs and appears to be critical for establishing a lysogen [24, 25]. The stable lysogen produces sufficient repressor not only to block prophage lytic development but also to block lytic development of any extraneous infection phage, thus imparting immunity to the lysogen against lytic superinfection [26].

Figure 1: λ cI repressor dimer bound to an operator fragment. A ribbon representation of the three-dimensional structure of the dimer complex crystallized by Stayrook et al. [1]. The N-terminal domain interacts with the operator DNA, the C-terminal domain self-associates and forms the dimer contacts. The two domains are connected by a linker that tethers the N-terminal domain to the C-terminal domain.

Figure 2: Structure of the λ cI C-terminal domain octamer. A ribbon representation of the three-dimensional structure of the octameric complex crystallized by Bell and Lewis [27]. Each of the four carboxy-terminal domain dimers that comprise the octamer are colored differently. The amino-terminal residues of each subunit are indicated. Because the amino-terminal residue of each subunit in the octamer points to the outside of the structure, the DNA-binding domains would fan around the structure. Since the structure closes up to itself, no higher-ordered oligomers can be formed.

[1] S. Stayrook, P. Jaru-Ampornpan, J. Ni, A. Hochschild, M. Lewis, Crystal structure of the lambda repressor and a model for pairwise cooperative operator binding, Nature 452 (2008) 1022-1025.

[2] C.O. Pabo, R.T. Sauer, J.M. Sturtevant, M. Ptashne, The lambda repressor contains two domains, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76 (1979) 1608-1612.

[3] C.E. Bell, P. Frescura, A. Hochschild, M. Lewis, Crystal structure of the lambda repressor C-terminal domain provides a model for cooperative operator binding, Cell 101 (2000) 801-811.

[4] J.W. Little, Autodigestion of lexA and phage lambda repressors, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81 (1984) 1375-1379.

[5] R.T. Sauer, M.J. Ross, M. Ptashne, Cleavage of the lambda and P22 repressors by recA protein, J Biol Chem 257 (1982) 4458-4462.

[6] R.T. Sauer, C.O. Pabo, B.J. Meyer, M. Ptashne, K.C. Backman, Regulatory functions of the lambda repressor reside in the amino-terminal domain, Nature 279 (1979) 396-400.

[7] J.W. Little, LexA cleavage and other self-processing reactions, J Bacteriol 175 (1993) 4943-4950.

[8] C.O. Pabo, M. Lewis, The operator-binding domain of lambda repressor: structure and DNA recognition, Nature 298 (1982) 443-447.

[9] L.J. Beamer, C.O. Pabo, Refined 1.8 A crystal structure of the lambda repressor-operator complex, J Mol Biol 227 (1992) 177-196.

[10] A. Hochschild, Transcriptional activation. How lambda repressor talks to RNA polymerase, Curr Biol 4 (1994) 440-442.

[11] C.O. Pabo, R.T. Sauer, Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition, Annu Rev Biochem 61 (1992) 1053-1095.

[12] A. Hochschild, The lambda switch: cI closes the gap in autoregulation, Curr Biol 12 (2002) R87-89.

[13] A.D. Johnson, B.J. Meyer, M. Ptashne, Interactions between DNA-bound repressors govern regulation by the lambda phage repressor, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76 (1979) 5061-5065.

[14] M. Ptashne, Genetic switch: phage lambda revisited, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2004.

[15] I.B. Dodd, K.E. Shearwin, J.B. Egan, Revisited gene regulation in bacteriophage lambda, Curr Opin Genet Dev 15 (2005) 145-152.

[16] I.B. Dodd, A.J. Perkins, D. Tsemitsidis, J.B. Egan, Octamerization of lambda CI repressor is needed for effective repression of P(RM) and efficient switching from lysogeny, Genes Dev 15 (2001) 3013-3022.

[17] I.B. Dodd, K.E. Shearwin, A.J. Perkins, T. Burr, A. Hochschild, J.B. Egan, Cooperativity in long-range gene regulation by the lambda CI repressor, Genes Dev 18 (2004) 344-354.

[18] B. Revet, B. von Wilcken-Bergmann, H. Bessert, A. Barker, B. Muller-Hill, Four dimers of lambda repressor bound to two suitably spaced pairs of lambda operators form octamers and DNA loops over large distances, Curr Biol 9 (1999) 151-154.

[19] S.L. Svenningsen, N. Costantino, D.L. Court, S. Adhya, On the role of Cro in lambda prophage induction, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 (2005) 4465-4469.

[20] B.J. Meyer, M. Ptashne, Gene regulation at the right operator (OR) of bacteriophage lambda. III. lambda repressor directly activates gene transcription, J Mol Biol 139 (1980) 195-205.

[21] D. Jain, B.E. Nickels, L. Sun, A. Hochschild, S.A. Darst, Structure of a ternary transcription activation complex, Mol Cell 13 (2004) 45-53.

[22] B.E. Nickels, S.L. Dove, K.S. Murakami, S.A. Darst, A. Hochschild, Protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions of sigma70 region 4 involved in transcription activation by lambdacI, J Mol Biol 324 (2002) 17-34.

[23] M.E. Furth, W.F. Dove, B.J. Meyer, Specificity determinants for bacteriophage lambda DNA replication. III. Activation of replication in lambda ric mutants by transcription outside of ori, J Mol Biol 154 (1982) 65-83.

[24] K. Mensa-Wilmot, K. Carroll, R. McMacken, Transcriptional activation of bacteriophage lambda DNA replication in vitro: regulatory role of histone-like protein HU of Escherichia coli, EMBO J 8 (1989) 2393-2402.

[25] M.S. Wold, J.B. Mallory, J.D. Roberts, J.H. LeBowitz, R. McMacken, Initiation of bacteriophage lambda DNA replication in vitro with purified lambda replication proteins, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79 (1982) 6176-6180.

[26] D.L. Court, A.B. Oppenheim, S.L. Adhya, A new look at bacteriophage lambda genetic networks, J Bacteriol 189 (2007) 298-304.

[27] C.E. Bell, M. Lewis, Crystal structure of the lambda repressor C-terminal domain octamer, J Mol Biol 314 (2001) 1127-1136.

• Recent changes
• What links here
• Related changes
• Special pages
• My preferences

• Printable version
• Permanent link
• Privacy policy
• Disclaimers