Team:Paris/Analysis/Design1

From 2008.igem.org

Revision as of 17:24, 26 October 2008 by Cyprien (Talk | contribs)

Network Design - Part 1


Contents

Creating an oscillatory system

Already existing genetic oscillators and their limits

Designing a simple genetic network that presents an oscillatory behavior is one of the first challenge synthetic biology overcame. More or less successfully. We can count more than ten synthetic genetic oscillators that have varied period and mechanisms. Raúl GUANTES and Juan F. POYATOS (2006) studied the most simple oscillators composed of two elements while Michael B. ELOWITZ and Stanislas LEIBLER (2000) designed the more complex "repressilator" (Table 1), to quote only the best known.

Two examples of genetic oscillators. A : a simple oscillator composed of two elements. B : the repressilator. (Legend : Green arrow : Activation. Red blunt arrow : Inhibition)

Both oscillators work : we can observe oscillations but only a limited number of cycles. Actually, they always reach a steady-state because the degradation/dilution rate is often too low : at the end of each cycle, the conditions are not exactly the initial conditions. Experimentally, the longer is the period the more cycles we can observe.

Design of our genetic oscillator : The Feed Forward Loop

We want to design a simple oscillator that oscillates during as many cycles as possible. We propose a system based on an oscillator composed of two elements on which we added a delay at the end of each cycle.

Uri ALON described genetic network motifs that generate a delay. Those motifs are the type 1 coherent Feed Forward Loop (C1-FFL). More on C1-FFL.

We will use one of those network to increase the run of each period and permit more oscillations.

Limits of our network