Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico/Notebook/2008-July
From 2008.igem.org
Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
<p>Investigate enzymes average half-life:<br> | <p>Investigate enzymes average half-life:<br> | ||
Article: Arribas E., Muñoz-Lopez A., Garcia-Meseguer M.J., Lopez-Najera A., Avalos L., Garcia-Molina F., Garcia-Moreno M., Varon R., 2008. Mean Lifetime and First-Passage Time of the Enzyme Species Involved in an Enzyme Reaction. Application to Unstable Enzyme Systems. Bull. Math. Biol. 70: 1425–1449 </p> | Article: Arribas E., Muñoz-Lopez A., Garcia-Meseguer M.J., Lopez-Najera A., Avalos L., Garcia-Molina F., Garcia-Moreno M., Varon R., 2008. Mean Lifetime and First-Passage Time of the Enzyme Species Involved in an Enzyme Reaction. Application to Unstable Enzyme Systems. Bull. Math. Biol. 70: 1425–1449 </p> | ||
- | <p>HALF-LIVES:<br> | + | <p><strong>HALF-LIVES:</strong><br> |
- aiiA: <a href="http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2006/project/Oscillator/Modelling/Realistic_Values">The Imperial College</a> iGEM site states that aiiA half-life is of 24 hours. The value of analogue proteins is determined in other articles.<br> | - aiiA: <a href="http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2006/project/Oscillator/Modelling/Realistic_Values">The Imperial College</a> iGEM site states that aiiA half-life is of 24 hours. The value of analogue proteins is determined in other articles.<br> | ||
- cI: cI has a half-life 40 minutes (Arkin, Ross, McAdams 1998). In another study, done in <em>E. coli</em>, cI is reported to have a half-life of 10 hours (Parsell, Silber & Sauer 1990), the amino acid sequence reported in that study is the same as the cI from the biopart we are using. In another study (Andersen et al 1998), they determined the effect of the LVA tail on a GFP. They designed constructions with different LVA tails attached to a mutant GFP with a half-life greater than one day. The addition of the LVA tail decreased the half-life to 40 minutes, which would equal to ~1/36 of the half-life of the wild type. <br> | - cI: cI has a half-life 40 minutes (Arkin, Ross, McAdams 1998). In another study, done in <em>E. coli</em>, cI is reported to have a half-life of 10 hours (Parsell, Silber & Sauer 1990), the amino acid sequence reported in that study is the same as the cI from the biopart we are using. In another study (Andersen et al 1998), they determined the effect of the LVA tail on a GFP. They designed constructions with different LVA tails attached to a mutant GFP with a half-life greater than one day. The addition of the LVA tail decreased the half-life to 40 minutes, which would equal to ~1/36 of the half-life of the wild type. <br> | ||
Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
- RcnA: Some important facts about RcnA that could help us calculate its half-life:<br> | - RcnA: Some important facts about RcnA that could help us calculate its half-life:<br> | ||
It has a length of 274 residues with 6 transmembrane domains, a mass of 32 kDa and a zone very rich in histidines (17 histidines, 3 aspartatates and 3 glutamates in a region of 26 amino acids). Source: Rodrigue, Effantin & Mandrand-Berthelot (2005). On page 1076 of the Lehninger there is a table, modified from Bachmair, Finley & Varshavsky (1986), which relates proteins half-life with its amino terminal residue.</p> | It has a length of 274 residues with 6 transmembrane domains, a mass of 32 kDa and a zone very rich in histidines (17 histidines, 3 aspartatates and 3 glutamates in a region of 26 amino acids). Source: Rodrigue, Effantin & Mandrand-Berthelot (2005). On page 1076 of the Lehninger there is a table, modified from Bachmair, Finley & Varshavsky (1986), which relates proteins half-life with its amino terminal residue.</p> | ||
- | <p>PROMOTER EFFICIENCY: <br> | + | <p><strong>PROMOTER EFFICIENCY:</strong> <br> |
- Pm (promoter repressed by cI): In Reinitz y Vaisnys (1990), they reported that the Gibbs free energy of the binding of <em>E.</em> <em>coli</em>’s polymerase to the promoter is -12.5kcal mol-1. They also reminded us that an association constant k, can formally be translated to Gibbs free energy through the following equation: k = exp(ΔG/RT), where R is the universal gas constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin degrees (310°K, equals to 37°C) and ΔG is the difference in the free energy of Gibbs between the bound and unbound states. They also report that the synthesis rate for cro under control of the Pm promoter is 4.7 x 10-9 mol/min (We still have to discuss if this could be linked with RcnA).<br> | - Pm (promoter repressed by cI): In Reinitz y Vaisnys (1990), they reported that the Gibbs free energy of the binding of <em>E.</em> <em>coli</em>’s polymerase to the promoter is -12.5kcal mol-1. They also reminded us that an association constant k, can formally be translated to Gibbs free energy through the following equation: k = exp(ΔG/RT), where R is the universal gas constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin degrees (310°K, equals to 37°C) and ΔG is the difference in the free energy of Gibbs between the bound and unbound states. They also report that the synthesis rate for cro under control of the Pm promoter is 4.7 x 10-9 mol/min (We still have to discuss if this could be linked with RcnA).<br> | ||
- p(AHL:LuxR): The maximum transcription rate of a sequence under control of the AHL:LuxR activator is reported as 1.4 x 10-2 ms-1, by Goryachev, Toh & Lee (2006).</p> | - p(AHL:LuxR): The maximum transcription rate of a sequence under control of the AHL:LuxR activator is reported as 1.4 x 10-2 ms-1, by Goryachev, Toh & Lee (2006).</p> | ||
- | <p>DISSOCIATION RATE:<br> | + | <p><strong>DISSOCIATION RATE:</strong><br> |
- cI: It seems that the dimerization of cI is important for its activation, therefore we are considering including it in the equations. According to Babic & Little (2007) cI slowly dimerizes. In Reinitz y Vaisnys (1990) dimeric cI dissociation rate is defined as 2.0 x 10-8 M.</p> | - cI: It seems that the dimerization of cI is important for its activation, therefore we are considering including it in the equations. According to Babic & Little (2007) cI slowly dimerizes. In Reinitz y Vaisnys (1990) dimeric cI dissociation rate is defined as 2.0 x 10-8 M.</p> | ||
<p>Others:<br> | <p>Others:<br> |
Revision as of 22:02, 31 August 2008
LCG-UNAM-Mexico | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
iGEM 2008 TEAM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||