Judging/Variance/BNU

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(New page: ===Request=== Dear sir: I am writing on behalf of BNU Team. We are using the non-standard parts, PZ series vector besides the standard vector, pSB1AC3. Because we found somehow this st...)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Request===
===Request===
-
Dear sir:  
+
 
-
  I am writing on behalf of BNU Team. We are using the non-standard parts, PZ series vector besides the standard vector, pSB1AC3. Because we found somehow this standard vector is sometimes unstable in our experiments. So I am writing for the permission.
+
Dear sir:
 +
 +
I am writing on behalf of BNU Team. We are using the non-standard parts, PZ series vector besides the standard vector, pSB1AC3. Because we found somehow this standard vector is sometimes unstable in our experiments. So I am writing for the permission.
   
   
best regards,
best regards,
 +
Sally
Sally
 +
Beijing Normal University
Beijing Normal University
Line 11: Line 15:
Dear Sally:
Dear Sally:
-
It is not uncommon for parts to be unstable in high copy number plasmids.  First, we want to remind you that there are other low to medium copy number biobrick standard vectors already available for parts submission, and you may find that your parts are stable in one of those. However, we are inclined to permit you to submit parts on a PZ series vector if you can document it as a new biobricks standard.  That assumes the proposed vector is compatible with the BBa cloning scheme, or another scheme similarly defined. If you chose that path, please immediately send thorough documentation of your proposed vector and evidence that it works.  For examples of stable low to medium copy number vectors, and the level of documentation expected, see http://partsregistry.org/cgi/partsdb/pgroup.cgi?pgroup=Plasmid.
+
It is not uncommon for parts to be unstable in high copy number plasmids.  First, we want to remind you that there are other low to medium copy number biobrick standard vectors already available for parts submission, and you may find that your parts are stable in one of those. However, we are inclined to permit you to submit parts on a PZ series vector if you can document it as a new biobricks standard.  That assumes the proposed vector is compatible with the BBa cloning scheme, or another scheme similarly defined. If you chose that path, please immediately send thorough documentation of your proposed vector and evidence that it works.  For examples of stable low to medium copy number vectors, and the level of documentation expected, see http://partsregistry.org/cgi/partsdb/pgroup.cgi?pgroup=Plasmid
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
-
iGEM judging
+
iGEM judging team

Latest revision as of 18:36, 5 October 2008

Request

Dear sir:

I am writing on behalf of BNU Team. We are using the non-standard parts, PZ series vector besides the standard vector, pSB1AC3. Because we found somehow this standard vector is sometimes unstable in our experiments. So I am writing for the permission.

best regards,

Sally

Beijing Normal University

Response

Dear Sally:

It is not uncommon for parts to be unstable in high copy number plasmids. First, we want to remind you that there are other low to medium copy number biobrick standard vectors already available for parts submission, and you may find that your parts are stable in one of those. However, we are inclined to permit you to submit parts on a PZ series vector if you can document it as a new biobricks standard. That assumes the proposed vector is compatible with the BBa cloning scheme, or another scheme similarly defined. If you chose that path, please immediately send thorough documentation of your proposed vector and evidence that it works. For examples of stable low to medium copy number vectors, and the level of documentation expected, see http://partsregistry.org/cgi/partsdb/pgroup.cgi?pgroup=Plasmid

Sincerely,

iGEM judging team