Team:iHKU/design
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
<th width="10%"> </th> | <th width="10%"> </th> | ||
<td width="80%" align="left"><h1 class="style7">Design</h1> | <td width="80%" align="left"><h1 class="style7">Design</h1> | ||
- | <h3 class="style7">Our Aim</h3> | + | <ul> |
+ | <li class="style18"><strong><a href="#1"><span class="style7">Our Aim</span></a></strong></li> | ||
+ | <li class="style18"><strong><a href="#2">Chassis selection</a></strong></li> | ||
+ | <li class="style18"><strong><a href="#3">Genetic Circuit Design</a></strong></li> | ||
+ | <li class="style18"><strong><a href="#4">Plasmids and strains</a></strong></li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <h3 class="style7"> </h3> | ||
+ | <h3 class="style7"><strong><a name="1" id="1"></a></strong>Our Aim</h3> | ||
<p>We endeavor our strains to grow into patterns by arranging themselves in a synchronous, self-organised manner, “just as in organisms in nature which all are able to develop shapes and patterns.” Implementing such idea on bacteria sheds light to a mechanism involving cell-cell communication that would produce a key response, predominately a respond affecting cell motility. The characteristics of the response logically should be critical towards the formation overall pattern. </p> | <p>We endeavor our strains to grow into patterns by arranging themselves in a synchronous, self-organised manner, “just as in organisms in nature which all are able to develop shapes and patterns.” Implementing such idea on bacteria sheds light to a mechanism involving cell-cell communication that would produce a key response, predominately a respond affecting cell motility. The characteristics of the response logically should be critical towards the formation overall pattern. </p> | ||
- | <h3><strong>Chassis selection</strong></h3> | + | <h3><strong><a name="2" id="2"></a>Chassis selection</strong></h3> |
<p>Past chemotaxis studies have provided the molecular basis of cellular motility regulation, <em>Escherichia coli</em> and Bacillus subtilis are notably the well-understood strains which are ideal to be the chassis of our designed genetic circuit. We chose <em>E.coli</em> as our chassis for the project reasoning that cell-cell communications will require the use of a signaling molecule, which are often density related. <em>E.coli</em> is known to be less motile than <em>Bacillus</em> in terms of speed, thus would ease the accumulation of the signaling molecule. We hope the subsequent pattern generated by using <em>E.coli</em> as chassis would be finer and more interesting.</p> | <p>Past chemotaxis studies have provided the molecular basis of cellular motility regulation, <em>Escherichia coli</em> and Bacillus subtilis are notably the well-understood strains which are ideal to be the chassis of our designed genetic circuit. We chose <em>E.coli</em> as our chassis for the project reasoning that cell-cell communications will require the use of a signaling molecule, which are often density related. <em>E.coli</em> is known to be less motile than <em>Bacillus</em> in terms of speed, thus would ease the accumulation of the signaling molecule. We hope the subsequent pattern generated by using <em>E.coli</em> as chassis would be finer and more interesting.</p> | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
- | <h3><strong>Genetic Circuit Design</strong></h3> | + | <h3><strong><a name="3" id="3"></a>Genetic Circuit Design</strong></h3> |
<p>An On-Off motility design is desired as the response to cell-cell communication. Based on the pioneer work (Topp & Gallivan 2006) shows the motility can be abolished by knocking out the <strong><em>cheZ</em></strong>gene, and can be restored by subsequent re-introduction of the <em>cheZ</em> gene under a controllable promoter back into the host.<br /> | <p>An On-Off motility design is desired as the response to cell-cell communication. Based on the pioneer work (Topp & Gallivan 2006) shows the motility can be abolished by knocking out the <strong><em>cheZ</em></strong>gene, and can be restored by subsequent re-introduction of the <em>cheZ</em> gene under a controllable promoter back into the host.<br /> | ||
We designed two DNA constructs whose cheZ expression level would be sensitive to the concentration of AHL (Acetyl homoserine lactone). One would become <strong>motile</strong> in the presence of AHL, while the other one be become <strong>immotile </strong>under the same condition. Since concentration of AHL is proportional to <strong>cell density</strong>, the motility of our strains would be dependent on local cell density.</p> | We designed two DNA constructs whose cheZ expression level would be sensitive to the concentration of AHL (Acetyl homoserine lactone). One would become <strong>motile</strong> in the presence of AHL, while the other one be become <strong>immotile </strong>under the same condition. Since concentration of AHL is proportional to <strong>cell density</strong>, the motility of our strains would be dependent on local cell density.</p> | ||
Line 247: | Line 254: | ||
<h1 align="center"><img src="/wiki/images/thumb/1/1e/Design_pic3.png/800px-Design_pic3.png" width="465" height="230" /></h1> | <h1 align="center"><img src="/wiki/images/thumb/1/1e/Design_pic3.png/800px-Design_pic3.png" width="465" height="230" /></h1> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
- | <h3><strong>Plasmids and strains</strong></h3> | + | <h3><strong><a name="4" id="4"></a>Plasmids and strains</strong></h3> |
</td> | </td> | ||
<td width="10%"> </td> | <td width="10%"> </td> |
Revision as of 16:26, 29 October 2008