DNA-Origami
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<font face="Arial Rounded MT Bold" style="color:#010369">_DNA-Origami</font></div> | <font face="Arial Rounded MT Bold" style="color:#010369">_DNA-Origami</font></div> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | + | <h2>Introduction</h2> | |
Paul Rothemund has discovered that it is possible to shape M13-Phage single-strand-DNA simply adding oligonucleotides that will work as „brackets“ when complementing the long single-strand.<br> In this way, one can generate for example DNA-squares of a certain size with „nods“ at certain distances. | Paul Rothemund has discovered that it is possible to shape M13-Phage single-strand-DNA simply adding oligonucleotides that will work as „brackets“ when complementing the long single-strand.<br> In this way, one can generate for example DNA-squares of a certain size with „nods“ at certain distances. | ||
One member of our team, Daniel Hautzinger, has recently finished his diploma-thesis on Origami-DNA and the possibilities of generating patterns on these square surfaces by modifying the oligo-nucleotides that build up the nod-points.<br> | One member of our team, Daniel Hautzinger, has recently finished his diploma-thesis on Origami-DNA and the possibilities of generating patterns on these square surfaces by modifying the oligo-nucleotides that build up the nod-points.<br> | ||
As the antigens NIP and fluoresceine can as well be fused to these oligos, we had found the seemingly perfect tool to present strictly defined two-dimensional antigen-patterns to cells carrying our synthetic receptor system. | As the antigens NIP and fluoresceine can as well be fused to these oligos, we had found the seemingly perfect tool to present strictly defined two-dimensional antigen-patterns to cells carrying our synthetic receptor system. | ||
[[Image:Freiburg2008_Fab_on_Origami_animated.gif|800 px]] | [[Image:Freiburg2008_Fab_on_Origami_animated.gif|800 px]] | ||
- | + | <h2>Literature</h2> | |
*Paul W. K. Rothemund: Nature 440, 297-302 (16 March 2006) | *Paul W. K. Rothemund: Nature 440, 297-302 (16 March 2006) | ||
- | + | <h2>Methods</h2> | |
- | < | + | <h3>Phage DNA<span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></h3> |
- | < | + | <h4><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><span |
style="font-weight: bold;">Cell culture</span><br> | style="font-weight: bold;">Cell culture</span><br> | ||
- | </ | + | </h4> |
50 ml DYT-Medium, 50µl tetracycline (TET; 25 mg/ ml) and ER2738-cells | 50 ml DYT-Medium, 50µl tetracycline (TET; 25 mg/ ml) and ER2738-cells | ||
were shaken over night at 37°C. The overnight culture was diluted with | were shaken over night at 37°C. The overnight culture was diluted with | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
around 0.4. Each 50 ml of cell culture were inoculated with 5 µl | around 0.4. Each 50 ml of cell culture were inoculated with 5 µl | ||
M13mp18 phage and shaken for 4 h at 37°C.<br> | M13mp18 phage and shaken for 4 h at 37°C.<br> | ||
- | < | + | <h4>Isolation of M13mp18 phage from cell culture</h4> |
PEG/NaCl was used to precipitate the phages.<br> | PEG/NaCl was used to precipitate the phages.<br> | ||
<span style="font-weight: bold;">First precipitation</span><br> | <span style="font-weight: bold;">First precipitation</span><br> | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
gently by inverting the tube. The mixture (Solution 3) was left for 1 h | gently by inverting the tube. The mixture (Solution 3) was left for 1 h | ||
on ice. Solution 3 was centrifuged at 13200 rpm for 10 min.<br> | on ice. Solution 3 was centrifuged at 13200 rpm for 10 min.<br> | ||
- | < | + | <h4>Define phage titers</h4> |
The absorption of Solution 3 was measured on a Jasco V-550 UV/VIS | The absorption of Solution 3 was measured on a Jasco V-550 UV/VIS | ||
spectrometer at 269 nm. <br> | spectrometer at 269 nm. <br> | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
((A269-A360) * 6 * 10^16 * dilution factor) / (number of bases in the | ((A269-A360) * 6 * 10^16 * dilution factor) / (number of bases in the | ||
phage genom = 7249 bp)</span><br> | phage genom = 7249 bp)</span><br> | ||
- | < | + | <h4>Isolation of the phage DNA </h4> |
The phage DNA was isolated with QIAprep Spin M13-Kit (50) from QIAGEN | The phage DNA was isolated with QIAprep Spin M13-Kit (50) from QIAGEN | ||
(Cat.No: 27704). <br> | (Cat.No: 27704). <br> | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><br> | <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br> | ||
</span> | </span> | ||
- | < | + | <h3><span style="font-weight: bold;">Origami</span></h3> |
- | < | + | <h4><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span>Produce |
the Origami<br> | the Origami<br> | ||
- | </ | + | </h4> |
To produce the Origami we mixed each the M13mp18 DNA with the oligos, | To produce the Origami we mixed each the M13mp18 DNA with the oligos, | ||
water and TEA/MgAcetat (end concentration =12.5mM).<br> | water and TEA/MgAcetat (end concentration =12.5mM).<br> | ||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
the 2 oligos with the Alexa 488 were used.<br> | the 2 oligos with the Alexa 488 were used.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | < | + | <h4><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span>Purification of the DNA-Origamis<br> |
- | </ | + | </h4> |
To purify the DNA-Origamis from the unbound DNA-oligos we used Montage® PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices (Millipore). The Montage® PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices were labeled and put with the purple side on tod in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes. To clean the filter of remaining Glycerin, 450 µl TAE/MgAcetat (12.5mM; 1x filtered) was put on top of the filter and centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 g. After removing the filtrate, 400 µl TEA/MgAcetat (12.5 mM;1x filtered) and 45 µl DNA-origami were put on top of the filter and again centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 g. The filtrate was removed again. All unbound DNA-oligos were washed off by putting 400 µl TEA/MgAcetat (12.5 mM; 1x filtered) on top of the filter. The sample was centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 g. To release the DNA-origamis of the filter100µl TAE/MgAcetat (12.5 mM;1x filtered) was put on top of the filter and the filter was left at room temperature at least for 2 min. The filter shouldn´t run dry. The Montage® PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices were put upside down (the purple side has to be on bottom) in one of the special Invert Spin tubes form Millipore and centrifuged for 3 min at 1000 g. | To purify the DNA-Origamis from the unbound DNA-oligos we used Montage® PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices (Millipore). The Montage® PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices were labeled and put with the purple side on tod in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes. To clean the filter of remaining Glycerin, 450 µl TAE/MgAcetat (12.5mM; 1x filtered) was put on top of the filter and centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 g. After removing the filtrate, 400 µl TEA/MgAcetat (12.5 mM;1x filtered) and 45 µl DNA-origami were put on top of the filter and again centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 g. The filtrate was removed again. All unbound DNA-oligos were washed off by putting 400 µl TEA/MgAcetat (12.5 mM; 1x filtered) on top of the filter. The sample was centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 g. To release the DNA-origamis of the filter100µl TAE/MgAcetat (12.5 mM;1x filtered) was put on top of the filter and the filter was left at room temperature at least for 2 min. The filter shouldn´t run dry. The Montage® PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices were put upside down (the purple side has to be on bottom) in one of the special Invert Spin tubes form Millipore and centrifuged for 3 min at 1000 g. | ||
The Origami were kept in different buffers. For this TEA/MgAcetat (12.5 mM; 1x filtered) was replaced by the according buffer.<br> | The Origami were kept in different buffers. For this TEA/MgAcetat (12.5 mM; 1x filtered) was replaced by the according buffer.<br> | ||
- | < | + | <h4><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span>Atomic force microscopy to prove if the origami stable |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | </ | + | </h4> |
To see if the Origami were formed well and stable in the different buffers an atomic force microscope (AFM) was used. The measurement itself was done in air (not in the buffer). | To see if the Origami were formed well and stable in the different buffers an atomic force microscope (AFM) was used. The measurement itself was done in air (not in the buffer). | ||
The DNA-Origami were absorbed to freshly cleaved mica. Therefore the mica was cut into 6 mm pieces and affixed to the metal panes we used for the measurement. To get a atomically clean surface a adhesive tape was used to remove the topmost mica layers. After this the sample could be put on. First 2-10 ml of the sample were put on the mica and then quickly diluted with water (just as much that the mica was covered with fluid). The sample was incubated for about 5 min and then the mica was blown dry with a stream of nitrogen. Then the sample could be measured. | The DNA-Origami were absorbed to freshly cleaved mica. Therefore the mica was cut into 6 mm pieces and affixed to the metal panes we used for the measurement. To get a atomically clean surface a adhesive tape was used to remove the topmost mica layers. After this the sample could be put on. First 2-10 ml of the sample were put on the mica and then quickly diluted with water (just as much that the mica was covered with fluid). The sample was incubated for about 5 min and then the mica was blown dry with a stream of nitrogen. Then the sample could be measured. | ||
The metal pane was fixed in the metal sample holder by a magnet, so that the sample could not move itself during the measurement. | The metal pane was fixed in the metal sample holder by a magnet, so that the sample could not move itself during the measurement. | ||
- | < | + | <h2>Results and Discussion</h2> |
- | < | + | <h3>1. Different ratios of Origami</h3> |
Because we also wanted to measure the calcium influx in the LSRII | Because we also wanted to measure the calcium influx in the LSRII | ||
fluorescence spectrometer, we had to increase the concentration of the | fluorescence spectrometer, we had to increase the concentration of the | ||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
As we see in the figures 1-3 are all Origami well formed. So we are | As we see in the figures 1-3 are all Origami well formed. So we are | ||
able to use a 1:5 ratio to produce our Origami.<br> | able to use a 1:5 ratio to produce our Origami.<br> | ||
- | < | + | <h3>2. Origami in Krebs-Ringer-Hepes buffer</h3> |
The TEA/MgAcetat buffer we used to build and keep the Origami does not | The TEA/MgAcetat buffer we used to build and keep the Origami does not | ||
have any salts beside the magnesium. Therefore the T cells are not able | have any salts beside the magnesium. Therefore the T cells are not able | ||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
didn´t see any Origami (data not shown). <br> | didn´t see any Origami (data not shown). <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | < | + | <h3>Future prospects</h3> |
Calcium has the same charge as magnesium, but the ionic radius of | Calcium has the same charge as magnesium, but the ionic radius of | ||
magnesium is much bigger, which could lead to deformed and instable | magnesium is much bigger, which could lead to deformed and instable |
Revision as of 19:13, 29 October 2008