Team:Paris/Network analysis and design/System improvements
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(9 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Paris/Menu}} | {{Paris/Menu}} | ||
{{Paris/Header|System Improvements}} | {{Paris/Header|System Improvements}} | ||
+ | {{Paris/Section_contents_analysis}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Description == | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Analysis == | ||
+ | |||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| | {| | ||
Line 11: | Line 18: | ||
| style="background: #D4E2EF;"|Core system | | style="background: #D4E2EF;"|Core system | ||
| Figure core system | | Figure core system | ||
- | | [[Image: | + | | [[Image:Core0.png|200px|center|Simulation of the core system]] |
| Links core system | | Links core system | ||
|- style="background: #dddddd;" | |- style="background: #dddddd;" | ||
- | | style="background: #D4E2EF;" | | + | | style="background: #D4E2EF;" |Bimodular system |
| Figure modular system | | Figure modular system | ||
- | | [[Image: | + | | [[Image:System4.png|200px|center|Simulation of the bimodular system]] |
| Links Garcia-Ojalvo | | Links Garcia-Ojalvo | ||
|- style="background: #dddddd;" | |- style="background: #dddddd;" | ||
- | | style="background: #D4E2EF;" | | + | | style="background: #D4E2EF;" |Unimodular system |
| Figure resulting system | | Figure resulting system | ||
| [[Image:Oscillating.jpg]] | | [[Image:Oscillating.jpg]] | ||
| Links resulting | | Links resulting | ||
|- style="background: #dddddd;" | |- style="background: #dddddd;" | ||
- | !colspan="4" | Synchronized oscillations should be given by | + | !colspan="4" | Synchronized oscillations should be given by the unimodular system. |
|}</center> | |}</center> | ||
Line 43: | Line 50: | ||
*S2: it amounts to replace single interaction by more complex interactions: should create delay | *S2: it amounts to replace single interaction by more complex interactions: should create delay | ||
- | we analyze both systems for their capacity to generate oscillations. S2 seems more promising. Thus we further analize S2 for its capacity to generate ''synchrionized'' oscillations. | + | we analyze both systems for their capacity to generate oscillations. |
+ | |||
+ | S2 seems more promising. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus we further analize S2 for its capacity to generate ''synchrionized'' oscillations (using different initial concentrations and cell populations variability). | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Conclusion == | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Navigation == | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[[Team:Paris/Network_analysis_and_design/System_improvements/Description|Description]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[[Team:Paris/Network_analysis_and_design/System_improvements/Analysis|Analysis]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[[Team:Paris/Network_analysis_and_design/System_improvements/Conclusions|Conclusion]] | ||
<!-- | <!-- |
Latest revision as of 00:42, 30 October 2008
System Improvements
Other pages:
DescriptionAnalysis
We need a 'delay' so we can: 1 add more genes to the circuit 2 use quorum sensing (qs) we chose quorum sensing that can allowed both 'delay' and population synchonization. two ways to add it:
we analyze both systems for their capacity to generate oscillations. S2 seems more promising. Thus we further analize S2 for its capacity to generate synchrionized oscillations (using different initial concentrations and cell populations variability). Conclusion
|