Team:Brown/Project/Analysis
From 2008.igem.org
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
- | ==NaCl Testing== | + | ==NaCl Resistance Testing== |
[[Image:Resistance-of-varying-salt-concentrations.gif|right|thumb|450px|Figure 4: We took the resistance of the varying concentrations of salt solutions in order to determine the sensitivity of our system. Readings of resistance were taken for 60 seconds for each solution.]] | [[Image:Resistance-of-varying-salt-concentrations.gif|right|thumb|450px|Figure 4: We took the resistance of the varying concentrations of salt solutions in order to determine the sensitivity of our system. Readings of resistance were taken for 60 seconds for each solution.]] | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
[[Image:Salt-tests-simulating-lysis.gif|right|thumb|500px|Figure 5: Resistance measurements of NaCl concentrations at 0.006M and 0.00605M. Our system was not capable of detecting a difference between these two concentrations of salt.]] | [[Image:Salt-tests-simulating-lysis.gif|right|thumb|500px|Figure 5: Resistance measurements of NaCl concentrations at 0.006M and 0.00605M. Our system was not capable of detecting a difference between these two concentrations of salt.]] | ||
- | |||
Line 107: | Line 106: | ||
- | ==Resistance Testing== | + | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We then reasoned that, if more ions were released into the solution, the more detectable the change in resistance should be. Therefore, if we concentrated the solution of cells a significant amount, a change in resistance should be observed. After further salt tests and calculations, it was determined the number of ions released by a 10mL culture of cells concentrated 50x should be detectable by our resistance apparatus. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Bacterial Resistance Testing== | ||
In order to test whether a change in resistance could be detected by a 50x concentration of cells, a test was conducted in which the resistance of the supernatant of a 50x concentrated cell solution was measured before and after lysis. | In order to test whether a change in resistance could be detected by a 50x concentration of cells, a test was conducted in which the resistance of the supernatant of a 50x concentrated cell solution was measured before and after lysis. | ||
Line 113: | Line 130: | ||
[[Image:Resist 50x brown.jpg|right|thumb|500px|Figure 6 This test was done with 50X concentrated pVJ4 E. coli bacteria grown in LB Lennox and resuspended in M9 Minimal Media. Cultures were made overnight. Resistance was measured for 60 seconds before and after lysis had occurred.]] | [[Image:Resist 50x brown.jpg|right|thumb|500px|Figure 6 This test was done with 50X concentrated pVJ4 E. coli bacteria grown in LB Lennox and resuspended in M9 Minimal Media. Cultures were made overnight. Resistance was measured for 60 seconds before and after lysis had occurred.]] | ||
+ | |||
- | + | The control cells contain plasmid pRG1 which contains the cell lysis cassette under the Lac promoter. The test cells contain the pVJ4 plasmid. | |
500 mL dilutions of both pRG1 and pVJ4 were made in LB Lennox and then centrifuged. The giant pellets were resuspended in 10mL of M9 Minimal Media. 0.2% arabinose was added to the pVJ4 culture with a 50% Arabinose Solution Our resistance apparatus recorded measurements overnight. Figure 6 shows the resistance readings before lysis and after lysis. As expected there is a decrease in resistance. | 500 mL dilutions of both pRG1 and pVJ4 were made in LB Lennox and then centrifuged. The giant pellets were resuspended in 10mL of M9 Minimal Media. 0.2% arabinose was added to the pVJ4 culture with a 50% Arabinose Solution Our resistance apparatus recorded measurements overnight. Figure 6 shows the resistance readings before lysis and after lysis. As expected there is a decrease in resistance. | ||
Line 140: | Line 158: | ||
==Conductivity Testing== | ==Conductivity Testing== | ||
- | + | ||
- | [[Image:Conductance-pvj4-v-prg1.gif|right|thumb|600px|Figure 8 This is a test of PVJ4 (which has the lysis cassette) and PRG-1 (which does not have the lysis cassette), with 0.2% Arabinose added to both. The PRG-1's conductance was measured before and after an overnight sitting and PVJ4 was measured continuously, due to limited equipment.]] | + | [[Image:Conductance-pvj4-v-prg1.gif|right|thumb|600px|Figure 8: This is a test of PVJ4 (which has the lysis cassette) and PRG-1 (which does not have the lysis cassette), with 0.2% Arabinose added to both. The PRG-1's conductance was measured before and after an overnight sitting and PVJ4 was measured continuously, due to limited equipment.]] |
* Different from expected resistance measurements, the conductivity of the lysed solutions greatly increased. Initial conductivity tests were run one after the other due to the limited availability of conductivity probes. Team Toxipop now has access to two probes. The probe was sensitive enough to pick up changes during cell lysis. The team did not need to concentrate the cells. Ten milliliter cultures were used only because the entire sensor (graphite) needed to be submerged within the solution. In future tests, we would like to minimize the volume of the bacterial solution to a fraction of a milliliter. Figure 7 is from tests run with the pVJ4 cassette with Arabinose added. The curve was what we expected to see. In addition, the increase in conductivity mirrors our Optical Density measurements with regard to time. Conductance increased after two to three hours while Optical Density decreased within that same time. Figure 8 represents a pVJ4 culture as well as the pRG1 plasmid (under the ''lacI'' promoter). Initial and final conductance readings were taken. Continuous readings could not be taken since the team only had access to one conductivity probe at the time. Nevertheless, the control remained the same before and after lysis had occurred in the experimental. | * Different from expected resistance measurements, the conductivity of the lysed solutions greatly increased. Initial conductivity tests were run one after the other due to the limited availability of conductivity probes. Team Toxipop now has access to two probes. The probe was sensitive enough to pick up changes during cell lysis. The team did not need to concentrate the cells. Ten milliliter cultures were used only because the entire sensor (graphite) needed to be submerged within the solution. In future tests, we would like to minimize the volume of the bacterial solution to a fraction of a milliliter. Figure 7 is from tests run with the pVJ4 cassette with Arabinose added. The curve was what we expected to see. In addition, the increase in conductivity mirrors our Optical Density measurements with regard to time. Conductance increased after two to three hours while Optical Density decreased within that same time. Figure 8 represents a pVJ4 culture as well as the pRG1 plasmid (under the ''lacI'' promoter). Initial and final conductance readings were taken. Continuous readings could not be taken since the team only had access to one conductivity probe at the time. Nevertheless, the control remained the same before and after lysis had occurred in the experimental. |
Revision as of 02:52, 30 October 2008
Optical DensityIn order to test the mechanism of the SRRz lysis cassette, we took optical density measurements as cell lysis occurred. The construct we used for testing was contained on the pVJ4 plasmid. This plasmid was obtained from the Mekalanos lab at HMS and contained the SRRz gene cassette in a pBAD18 plasmid. Initially we introduced arabinose to the culture of cells, allowed the cultures to sit at room temperature for several hours and measured the optical density before and after the cells lysed. The results are displayed in Figure 1. It was observed that when cells lysis occurred, the solution of lysing cells cleared after a few hours, providing qualitative evidence that lysis occurred (Figure 2). Next, we wanted to test the amount of time required for lysis to occur. We added 0.2% by volume of an arabinose stock solution to cell cultures and measured the optical densities of the cultures at discrete time points. The following graphs exhibit optical density trends during gene expression and resulting cell lysis and cell wall degradation. Figure 3a shows a test measuring optical density and correlates that data to a predicted change in resistance that should occur as the cells lyse. Figure 3B shows another test of change in optical density over time.
NaCl Resistance Testing
We then reasoned that, if more ions were released into the solution, the more detectable the change in resistance should be. Therefore, if we concentrated the solution of cells a significant amount, a change in resistance should be observed. After further salt tests and calculations, it was determined the number of ions released by a 10mL culture of cells concentrated 50x should be detectable by our resistance apparatus.
Bacterial Resistance TestingIn order to test whether a change in resistance could be detected by a 50x concentration of cells, a test was conducted in which the resistance of the supernatant of a 50x concentrated cell solution was measured before and after lysis.
500 mL dilutions of both pRG1 and pVJ4 were made in LB Lennox and then centrifuged. The giant pellets were resuspended in 10mL of M9 Minimal Media. 0.2% arabinose was added to the pVJ4 culture with a 50% Arabinose Solution Our resistance apparatus recorded measurements overnight. Figure 6 shows the resistance readings before lysis and after lysis. As expected there is a decrease in resistance.
Conductivity Testing
|