Team:Paris/Modeling/BOB/Akaike
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Using linear equations in a biological system might seem awkards. However, we wanted to check the relevance of this approach. We have been looking for a criterium that would penalize a system that had many parameters, but that would also penalize a system which quadratic error would be too important while fitting experimental values. | * Using linear equations in a biological system might seem awkards. However, we wanted to check the relevance of this approach. We have been looking for a criterium that would penalize a system that had many parameters, but that would also penalize a system which quadratic error would be too important while fitting experimental values. | ||
- | * | + | * Akaike and Schwarz criteria met our demands : |
- | [[Image:AIC.jpg|center]] | + | Akaike criterion : [[Image:AIC.jpg|center]] |
- | [[Image:AICc.jpg|center]] | + | Hurvich and Tsai criterion : [[Image:AICc.jpg|center]] |
- | [[Image:BIC.jpg|center]] | + | Schwarz criterion : [[Image:BIC.jpg|center]] |
+ | where n denotes the number of experimental values, k the number of parameters and RSS the residual sum of squares. | ||
+ | * It is remarquable that Akaike criterion and Hurvich and Tsai criterion are alike. AICc is therefore used for smal sample size, but converges to AIC as n gets large. Since we will work with 20 points for each experiment, it seemed relevant to present both models. | ||
+ | * As an experiment, we wished to compare two models presented below : | ||
+ | [[Image:syste_akaike_1.jpg]][[Image:syste_akaike_2.jpg]] | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
Revision as of 12:27, 3 September 2008
(Under Construction) Model Comparison
where n denotes the number of experimental values, k the number of parameters and RSS the residual sum of squares.
We mostly used the definition of the criteria given in : [http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/rej.2006.9.324 K. Kikkawa.Statistical issue of regression analysis on development of an age predictive equation. Rejuvenation research, Volume 9, n°2, 2006.] |