"
Brown: Team Resistance/10 October 2008
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: *Kate performed a control test with 50 mL of pRG-1. 400 uL of the 50% Arabinose solution were added to the pRG-1 solution. A 24 test with 12 readings per hour was done on the LoggerLite ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Kate performed a control test with 50 mL of pRG-1. 400 uL of the 50% Arabinose solution were added to the pRG-1 solution. A 24 test with 12 readings per hour was done on the LoggerLite application with the conductivity meter. | *Kate performed a control test with 50 mL of pRG-1. 400 uL of the 50% Arabinose solution were added to the pRG-1 solution. A 24 test with 12 readings per hour was done on the LoggerLite application with the conductivity meter. | ||
| - | *PCR was done of the Swt and S105 genes sent from Ry Young at Texas A&M. We got a PCR product of the S105 gene. | + | *PCR was done of the Swt and S105 genes sent from Ry Young at Texas A&M. We got a PCR product of the S105 gene around approximately 350 base pairs. |
Revision as of 17:40, 19 October 2008
- Kate performed a control test with 50 mL of pRG-1. 400 uL of the 50% Arabinose solution were added to the pRG-1 solution. A 24 test with 12 readings per hour was done on the LoggerLite application with the conductivity meter.
- PCR was done of the Swt and S105 genes sent from Ry Young at Texas A&M. We got a PCR product of the S105 gene around approximately 350 base pairs.
