Home

The Team

Project Report

Parts

Modeling

Notebook

Safety

CoLABoration

Introduction

Paul Rothemund has discovered that it is possible to shape M13-Phage single-strand-DNA simply adding oligonucleotides that will work as „brackets“ when complementing the long single-strand.
In this way, one can generate for example DNA-squares of a certain size with „nods“ at certain distances. One member of our team, Daniel Hautzinger, has recently finished his diploma-thesis on Origami-DNA and the possibilities of generating patterns on these square surfaces by modifying the oligo-nucleotides that build up the nod-points.
As the antigens NIP and fluoresceine can as well be fused to these oligos, we had found the seemingly perfect tool to present strictly defined two-dimensional antigen-patterns to cells carrying our synthetic receptor system. File:Freiburg2008 NIP arrangement schematical.jpg

Literature

• Paul W. K. Rothemund: Nature 440, 297-302 (16 March 2006)

Methods

Phage DNA

Cell culture

50 ml DYT-Medium, 50µl tetracycline (TET; 25 mg/ ml) and ER2738-cells were shaken over night at 37°C. The overnight culture was diluted with DYT to OD600=0.1 and shaken at 37°C until the culture had an OD600 around 0.4. Each 50 ml of cell culture were inoculated with 5 µl M13mp18 phage and shaken for 4 h at 37°C.

Isolation of M13mp18 phage from cell culture

PEG/NaCl was used to precipitate the phages.
First precipitation
Each 50 ml of cell culture were centrifuged at 5000 g for 20 min. While the cell were centrifuged 1/7 volume of the supernatant PEG/NaCl (about 7ml/50ml) was put in a new falcon tube. The phages stay in the supernatant therefore the supernatant was carefully decanted to the PEG/NaCl and mixed gently by inverting the tube. The mixture (Solution 1) was left overnight at 4°C.
Solution 1 was centrifuged at 5000 g for 20 min. Because the phage stay in the pellet, the supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in 2 ml TBS-Buffer (Solution 2). Solution 2 was put in a 1,5 ml Eppendorf tube and centrifuged (13200 rpm, 10 min). After the centrifugation the phages stay in the supernatant.
Second precipitation
170 µl PEG/NaCl(~ 1/6 volume of supernatant) were put in a Eppendorf tube. Supernatant was carefully decanted to the PEG/NaCl and mixed gently by inverting the tube. The mixture (Solution 3) was left for 1 h on ice. Solution 3 was centrifuged at 13200 rpm for 10 min.

Define phage titers

The absorption of Solution 3 was measured on a Jasco V-550 UV/VIS spectrometer at 269 nm.
Phage titer was calculated as follows:
Phage DNA = ((A269-A360) * 6 * 10^16 * dilution factor) / (number of bases in the phage genom = 7249 bp)

Isolation of the phage DNA

The phage DNA was isolated with QIAprep Spin M13-Kit (50) from QIAGEN (Cat.No: 27704).
DNA-concentration was quantified by Nano-drop photometer.

Origami

Produce the Origami

To produce the Origami we mixed each the M13mp18 DNA with the oligos, water and TEA/MgAcetat (end concentration =12.5mM).

<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> TABELLE 1</o:p>

<o:p>TABELLE 2</o:p>

Various samples were produced. For the sample with a ratio of 1:20 (DNA:Oligo) we used 4 nM DNA and 80 nM of oligos. The Origami were produced in a eppendorf Mastercycler personal. Therefore they were heated up to 95°C for 7 min and slowly cooled down (0.3°C/s) to 20°C.
Different sample were made:
Sample 1:20, 1:10 and 1:5 without NIP, oligos without NIP were used
Sample 1:20, 1:10 and 1:5 with NIP, all of the 7 oligos with NIP were used -> origami with 7NIP
Sample 1:5 with NIP and fluorophor, all of the 7 oligos with NIP and the 2 oligos with the Alexa 488 were used.

Purification of the DNA-Origamis

To purify the DNA-Origamis from the unbound DNA-oligos we used Montage® PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices (Millipore). The Montage® PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices were labeled and put with the purple side on tod in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes. To clean the filter of remaining Glycerin, 450 µl TAE/MgAcetat (12.5mM; 1x filtered) was put on top of the filter and centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 g. After removing the filtrate, 400 µl TEA/MgAcetat (12.5 mM;1x filtered) and 45 µl DNA-origami were put on top of the filter and again centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 g. The filtrate was removed again. All unbound DNA-oligos were washed off by putting 400 µl TEA/MgAcetat (12.5 mM; 1x filtered) on top of the filter. The sample was centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 g. To release the DNA-origamis of the filter100µl TAE/MgAcetat (12.5 mM;1x filtered) was put on top of the filter and the filter was left at room temperature at least for 2 min. The filter shouldn´t run dry. The Montage® PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices were put upside down (the purple side has to be on bottom) in one of the special Invert Spin tubes form Millipore and centrifuged for 3 min at 1000 g. The Origami were kept in different buffers. For this TEA/MgAcetat (12.5 mM; 1x filtered) was replaced by the according buffer.

Atomic force microscopy to prove if the origami stable

To see if the Origami were formed well and stable in the different buffers an atomic force microscope (AFM) was used. The measurement itself was done in air (not in the buffer). The DNA-Origami were absorbed to freshly cleaved mica. Therefore the mica was cut into 6 mm pieces and affixed to the metal panes we used for the measurement. To get a atomically clean surface a adhesive tape was used to remove the topmost mica layers. After this the sample could be put on. First 2-10 ml of the sample were put on the mica and then quickly diluted with water (just as much that the mica was covered with fluid). The sample was incubated for about 5 min and then the mica was blown dry with a stream of nitrogen. Then the sample could be measured. The metal pane was fixed in the metal sample holder by a magnet, so that the sample could not move itself during the measurement.

Results and Discussion

1. Different ratios of Origami

Because we also wanted to measure the calcium influx in the LSRII fluorescence spectrometer, we had to increase the concentration of the Origamis at least up to 200 nM. Because the oligos we had to use for building the Origamis are very expensiv we first tried to reduce the ratio of Origami to oligos. Therfore we tried to make Origamis with two (1:10) and four (1:5) times lower concentration of oligos. As positive control we took the 1:20 ratio at which we new it should be stable. We used the AFM to check if the Origami are well formed. The results are shown in figures 1-3.

BILDER ORIGAMI
As we see in the figures 1-3 are all Origami well formed. So we are able to use a 1:5 ratio to produce our Origami.

2. Origami in Krebs-Ringer-Hepes buffer

The TEA/MgAcetat buffer we used to build and keep the Origami does not have any salts beside the magnesium. Therefore the T cells are not able to survive long enough to measure the calcium influx.
Beside that, the EDTA would disturb the calcium measurement. Hence we would have to find a different buffer in which the Origami and the T cells are stable and which can also be used for the calcium measurement. In literature we found, that many people use a so-called Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer for calcium measurement in LSRII fluorescence spectrometer. We made we used 1:20 and 1:5 ratio of DNA to oligo to make the Origmi. Each of the ratios was buffered in Krebs-ringer-HEPES buffer. As positive control we used Origami buffered in TAE/MgAc. The results are shown in figure 4 and 5.

BILDER ORIGAMI

Both samples in Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer did not show the completely formed Origami. Some bigger structures in Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer in figure 4 seem to be parts of the Origami. Maybe the Origami did form right in the MasterCycler, but then fall apart when we buffered them in the Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer. Because we read in literature that some salts in the Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer could disturb the interaction of the Origami to the glimmer we first incubated the surface of the glimmer with Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer, before putting the Origami on it. Still we didn´t see any Origami (data not shown). The interference factor in the Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer could be the lack of magnesium or the calcium. Therefore we first tested if the Origami are stable in Origami in Krebs-Ringer-Hepes buffer with 12.5mM magnesium. Still we didn´t see any Origami (data not shown).  

Future prospects

Calcium has the same charge as magnesium, but the ionic radius of magnesium is much bigger, which could lead to deformed and instable Origami. Therefore it could be also tested if the Origami are stable in Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer with 12.5mM magnesium, but without calcium. Because the buffer has also to be suitable for the cells, the stability of the Origami in phosphate buffer without calcium should be tested.