Team:Paris/Modeling/f3

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 9: Line 9:
but we use <span style="color:#0000FF;">[aTc]<sub>i</sub> = Inv_&#131;1( [OmpR<sup>*</sup>] ) </span>
but we use <span style="color:#0000FF;">[aTc]<sub>i</sub> = Inv_&#131;1( [OmpR<sup>*</sup>] ) </span>
-
and        <span style="color:#0000FF;">[ara]<sub>i</sub> = Inv_&#131;2( [FliA] ) </span>
+
and        <span style="color:#0000FF;">[arab]<sub>i</sub> = Inv_&#131;2( [FliA] ) </span>
So, at steady-states,
So, at steady-states,
Line 19: Line 19:
<div style="text-align: center">
<div style="text-align: center">
-
{{Paris/Toggle|Table|Team:Paris/Modeling/More_f1_Table}}  
+
{{Paris/Toggle|Table|Team:Paris/Modeling/More_f3_Table}}  
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<div style="text-align: center">
-
{{Paris/Toggle|Algorithm|Team:Paris/Modeling/More_f1_Algo}}  
+
{{Paris/Toggle|Algorithm|Team:Paris/Modeling/More_f3_Algo}}  
</div>
</div>
-
Also, this experiment will enable us to know the expression of &#131;1 :
+
Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation
-
[[Image:ExprF1.jpg|center]]
+
[[Image:SumFlhDC1.jpg|center]]
<br>
<br>
Line 37: Line 37:
[[Team:Paris/Modeling/Protocol_Of_Characterization| <Back - to "Protocol Of Characterization" ]]|
[[Team:Paris/Modeling/Protocol_Of_Characterization| <Back - to "Protocol Of Characterization" ]]|
</center>
</center>
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
{|border="1" style="text-align: center"
 
-
|param
 
-
|signification
 
-
|unit
 
-
|value
 
-
|comments
 
-
|-
 
-
|[expr(pFlhDC)]
 
-
|expression rate of <br> pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032'''
 
-
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
 
-
|
 
-
|need for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [aTc]<sub>i</sub> <br> and for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [arab]<sub>i</sub> <br> and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
 
-
|-
 
-
|γ<sub>GFP</sub>
 
-
|dilution-degradation rate <br> of GFP(mut3b)
 
-
|min<sup>-1</sup>
 
-
|0.0198
 
-
|
 
-
|-
 
-
|[GFP]
 
-
|GFP concentration at steady-state
 
-
|nM
 
-
|
 
-
|need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
 
-
|-
 
-
|(''fluorescence'')
 
-
|value of the observed fluorescence
 
-
|au
 
-
|
 
-
|need for 20 + 20 measures <br> and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
 
-
|-
 
-
|''conversion''
 
-
|conversion ratio between <br> fluorescence and concentration
 
-
|nM.au<sup>-1</sup>
 
-
|(1/79.429)
 
-
|
 
-
|}
 
-
 
-
<br><br>
 
-
 
-
{|border="1" style="text-align: center"
 
-
|param
 
-
|signification <br> corresponding parameters in the [[Team:Paris/Modeling/Oscillations#Resulting_Equations|equations]]
 
-
|unit
 
-
|value
 
-
|comments
 
-
|-
 
-
|β<sub>13</sub>
 
-
|production rate of FliA-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>13</sub>
 
-
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
 
-
|
 
-
|
 
-
|-
 
-
|(K<sub>12</sub>/{coef<sub>fliA</sub>})
 
-
|activation constant of FliA-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>12</sub>
 
-
|nM
 
-
|
 
-
|
 
-
|-
 
-
|n<sub>12</sub>
 
-
|complexation order of FliA-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>12</sub>
 
-
|no dimension
 
-
|
 
-
|
 
-
|-
 
-
|β<sub>2</sub>
 
-
|production rate of OmpR-pFlhDC '''with RBS E0032''' <br> β<sub>2</sub>
 
-
|nM.min<sup>-1</sup>
 
-
|
 
-
|
 
-
|-
 
-
|(K<sub>22</sub>/{coef<sub>omp</sub>})
 
-
|activation constant of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> K<sub>22</sub>
 
-
|nM
 
-
|
 
-
|
 
-
|-
 
-
|n<sub>22</sub>
 
-
|complexation order of OmpR-pFlhDC <br> n<sub>22</sub>
 
-
|no dimension
 
-
|
 
-
|
 
-
|}
 
-
 
-
<br><br>
 
-
 
-
Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation
 
-
 
-
[[Image:SumFlhDC1.jpg|center]]
 

Revision as of 11:19, 29 October 2008

Method & Algorithm : ƒ1


Specific Plasmid Characterisation for ƒ3

We have [OmpR*]real = {coefomp}expr(pTet) = {coefomp} ƒ1([aTc]i) and [FliA]real = {coefFliA}expr(pBad) = {coefFliA} ƒ2([arab]i)

but we use [aTc]i = Inv_ƒ1( [OmpR*] ) and [arab]i = Inv_ƒ2( [FliA] )

So, at steady-states,

F3ompfinal.jpg




↓ Table ↑


param signification unit value comments
(fluorescence) value of the observed fluorescence au need for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [aTc]i
and for 20 mesures with well choosen values of [arab]i
and 5x5 measures for the relation below?
conversion conversion ratio between
fluorescence and concentration
↓ gives ↓ 		nM.au-1 (1/79.429)
[GFP] GFP concentration at steady-state nM
γGFP dilution-degradation rate
of GFP(mut3b)
↓ gives ↓ 		min-1 0.0198 Time Cell Division : 35 min.
ƒ3 activity of
pFlhDC with RBS E0032 		nM.min-1



param signification
corresponding parameters in the equations 		unit value comments
β22 total transcription rate of
FliA><pFlhDC with RBS B0034
β22 		nM.min-1
(K6/{coeffliA}) activation constant of FliA><pFlhDC
K6 		nM
n6 complexation order of FliA><pFlhDC
n6 		no dimension
β17 basal activity of
pFlhDC with RBS B0034
β17 		nM.min-1
(K15/{coefompR}) activation constant of OmpR><pFlhDC
K15 		nM
n15 complexation order of OmpR><pFlhDC
n15 		no dimension


↓ Algorithm ↑


find_ƒ3 ( FliA ) 

function optimal_parameters = find_f3_FliA(X_data, Y_data, initial_parameters)
% gives the 'best parameters' involved in f3 with OmpR = 0 by least-square optimisation
% -> USE IT AFTER find_f3_OmpR
 
% X_data = vector of given values of ( [FliA]i ) (experimentally
% controled)
% Y_data = vector of experimentally measured values f3 corresponding of
% the X_data
% initial_parameters = values of the parameters proposed by the literature
%                       or simply guessed
%                    = [beta22, K6 -> (K6)/(coefOmp), n6]
 
global beta17; % parameter GIVEN BY find_f3_OmpR
 
     function output = act_pFlhDC(parameters, X_data)
         for k = 1:length(X_data)
                 output(k) = beta17*(1 - hill( X_data(k), parameters(2), parameters(3))) ...
                     + parameters(1)*hill(X_data(k), parameters(2), parameters(3));
         end
     end
 
options=optimset('LevenbergMarquardt','on','TolX',1e-10,'MaxFunEvals',1e10,'TolFun',1e-10,'MaxIter',1e4);
% options for the function lsqcurvefit
 
optimal_parameters = lsqcurvefit( @(parameters, X_data) act_pFlhDC(parameters, X_data), ...
     initial_parameters, X_data, Y_data, options );
% search for the fittest parameters, between 1/10 and 10 times the initial
% parameters
 
end

find_ƒ3 ( OmpR* ) 

function optimal_parameters = find_f3_OmpR(X_data, Y_data, initial_parameters)
% gives the 'best parameters' involved in f3 with FliA = 0 by least-square optimisation
% -> USE IT BEFORE find_f3_FliA
 
% X_data = vector of given values of ( [OmpR]i ) (experimentally
% controled)
% Y_data = vector of experimentally measured values f3 corresponding of
% the X_data
% initial_parameters = values of the parameters proposed by the literature
%                       or simply guessed
%                    = [beta17, K15 -> (K15)/(coefOmp), n15]
 
     function output = act_pFlhDC(parameters, X_data)
         for k = 1:length(X_data)
                 output(k) =(1 - hill( X_data(k), parameters(2), parameters(3) )) * parameters(1);
         end
     end
 
options=optimset('LevenbergMarquardt','on','TolX',1e-10,'MaxFunEvals',1e10,'TolFun',1e-10,'MaxIter',1e4);
% options for the function lsqcurvefit
 
optimal_parameters = lsqcurvefit( @(parameters, X_data) act_pFlhDC(parameters, X_data), ...
    initial_parameters, X_data, Y_data, options );
% search for the fittest parameters, between 1/10 and 10 times the initial
% parameters
 
end

Then, if we have time, we want to verify the expected relation

SumFlhDC1.jpg


<Back - to "Implementation" |
<Back - to "Protocol Of Characterization" |

Retrieved from "http://2008.igem.org/Team:Paris/Modeling/f3"