Team:BrownTwo/Limiter/altdesign
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Ribozyme switch inhibition to knockdown leakiness of Repressor#3 (this would need to designed so that the aptamer on the repressor #3 mRNA responds to Repressor #2 protein) | *Ribozyme switch inhibition to knockdown leakiness of Repressor#3 (this would need to designed so that the aptamer on the repressor #3 mRNA responds to Repressor #2 protein) | ||
+ | |||
+ | In order to modify our limiter to regulate an endogenous gene network, one must study a gene pathway map and identify a single link between the gene of interest and a transcription factor that regulates the expression of that gene. | ||
+ | A handful of these parts were available in the Registry, but we found it necessary to | ||
+ | |||
+ | Modularity – | ||
+ | |||
+ | Stipulation: If G is a transcription factor that is known to auto-regulate, one will have to alter the modeling to account for this situation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | modifications to current scheme: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Possible further modifications to these transcription factors include the use of different regulation domains, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Involves the consideration of multiple binding sites |
Revision as of 01:23, 30 October 2008
Alternative construction and design possiblities
In order to modify our limiter to regulate an endogenous gene network, one must study a gene pathway map and identify a single link between the gene of interest and a transcription factor that regulates the expression of that gene. A handful of these parts were available in the Registry, but we found it necessary to Modularity – Stipulation: If G is a transcription factor that is known to auto-regulate, one will have to alter the modeling to account for this situation. modifications to current scheme:
Involves the consideration of multiple binding sites |