Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico/Notebook/2008-April

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 123: Line 123:
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
-
<td class="bodyText"><div align="justify"><p>Students’ investigation and presentation of previous iGEM projects.<br>Several previous iGEM projects were investigated and presented by members of the team. The idea behind this was to familiarize with the kind of projects previously presented.<br><br>
+
<td class="bodyText"><div align="justify"><p><b><u>GROUP SESSION:</b></u><br>Students’ investigation and presentation of previous iGEM projects.<br>Several previous iGEM projects were investigated and presented by members of the team. The idea behind this was to familiarize with the kind of projects previously presented.<br><br>
<b>Brainstorming<br></b><br>
<b>Brainstorming<br></b><br>
This activity was performed by all the members of the group. We came up with several ideas, some quite unfeasible, but nevertheless it was fun.<br><br>
This activity was performed by all the members of the group. We came up with several ideas, some quite unfeasible, but nevertheless it was fun.<br><br>
Line 152: Line 152:
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
-
<td class="bodyText"><div align="justify"><p><b>Choosing a Project</b><br><br>
+
<td class="bodyText"><div align="justify"><p><b><u>GROUP SESSION:</b></u><br><b>Choosing a Project</b><br><br>
Based on the previous brainstorming and some fresh ideas we chose seven potential projects. We stated positive and negative points on each of them, and each member voted for two projects. The three with the highest score were selected as preliminary projects. <br><br>
Based on the previous brainstorming and some fresh ideas we chose seven potential projects. We stated positive and negative points on each of them, and each member voted for two projects. The three with the highest score were selected as preliminary projects. <br><br>
Line 172: Line 172:
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
-
<td class="bodyText"><div align="justify"><p><b>Preliminary Projects Group Presentation</b><br><br>
+
<td class="bodyText"><div align="justify"><p><b><u>GROUP SESSION:</b></u><br><b>Preliminary Projects Group Presentation</b><br><br>
One or two members of each group described their projects and afterwards the whole team evaluated each of the projects. One was selected. <br><br>
One or two members of each group described their projects and afterwards the whole team evaluated each of the projects. One was selected. <br><br>
The team divided in four groups, each of them with a specific area: Mathematics, Bioinformatics, Biology and Physics/Chemistry. Each group would have to focus in their area during the project. Several tasks were assigned as homework including completely understanding a previous project and analyzing the pros and the cons of our team projects. <br><br>
The team divided in four groups, each of them with a specific area: Mathematics, Bioinformatics, Biology and Physics/Chemistry. Each group would have to focus in their area during the project. Several tasks were assigned as homework including completely understanding a previous project and analyzing the pros and the cons of our team projects. <br><br>
Line 253: Line 253:
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
-
<td class="bodyText"><div align="justify"><p>
+
<td class="bodyText"><div align="justify"><p><b><u>GROUP SESSION:</b></u><br>
<b>Defining new project</b><br><br>
<b>Defining new project</b><br><br>
We discussed the possibility of choosing three new preliminary projects to investigate and analyze next session since the project we had decided had already been done. <br><br>
We discussed the possibility of choosing three new preliminary projects to investigate and analyze next session since the project we had decided had already been done. <br><br>

Latest revision as of 01:16, 29 October 2008

LCG-UNAM-Mexico:Notebook/April

Header image
iGEM 2008 TEAM
line decor
  
line decor

 
 
 
 
 
 
April
2008-04-02

GROUP SESSION:
Students’ investigation and presentation of previous iGEM projects.
Several previous iGEM projects were investigated and presented by members of the team. The idea behind this was to familiarize with the kind of projects previously presented.

Brainstorming

This activity was performed by all the members of the group. We came up with several ideas, some quite unfeasible, but nevertheless it was fun.

Here are some of the ideas:

  • Bacteria capable of detecting diseases
  • Gas receptor
  • Sensing mood
  • Billboards with bacterias
  • Reacting to sounds
  • Swimming control
  • Motion sensors
  • Storing information and retreiving it afterwards
  • Solving mazes
  • Sensing alergens in foods
  • Sounds + Light
  • Invisible Ink
  • Degrading Tires
  • Making food starting with something unedible
  • Calculator
  • Degrading detergents
  • Writing from a distance
  • Removing oxide
  • Removing stains from clothing
  • 2008-04-09

    GROUP SESSION:
    Choosing a Project

    Based on the previous brainstorming and some fresh ideas we chose seven potential projects. We stated positive and negative points on each of them, and each member voted for two projects. The three with the highest score were selected as preliminary projects.

    The team divided in three groups, and each of these groups got in charge of researching one of the preliminary projects. The potential proyects were:

  • Bacteria capable of detecting something (alergens for example)
  • Reacting to noises
  • Degrading tires
  • Photosynthesis Biobrick*
  • Multistability
  • Gradual temporal sensor*
  • Modify an oscillator*
  • The ones marked with an asterisk, are the three preliminary projects.

    2008-04-16

    GROUP SESSION:
    Preliminary Projects Group Presentation

    One or two members of each group described their projects and afterwards the whole team evaluated each of the projects. One was selected.

    The team divided in four groups, each of them with a specific area: Mathematics, Bioinformatics, Biology and Physics/Chemistry. Each group would have to focus in their area during the project. Several tasks were assigned as homework including completely understanding a previous project and analyzing the pros and the cons of our team projects.

  • Photosynthesis:
  • Pros
    Cons
    Good project with a lot of potential Almost no modeling has been done
      Would be a long term project
      Made up by too many parts

  • Oscilator:
  • Pros
    Cons
    Demands little lab time It’s an extention of another project already done
    A lot of potential for modeling  
    Easy to implement  
    Strong theory (easy to generalize)  
    Would be a nice first approach  

  • Temporal Sensor:
  • Pros
    Cons
    Relevant Many parts
      Require much investigation
      Time it would take to accomplish this project

    2008-04-23

    GROUP SESSION:
    Defining new project

    We discussed the possibility of choosing three new preliminary projects to investigate and analyze next session since the project we had decided had already been done.

    We talked with Dr. Miguel about the feasibility of our projects.

    We pointed pros and cons on our six other potential projects. After a voting, three new preliminary projects were decided. The team divided in three groups and each of these groups was assigned to one of the preliminary projects. The three newly selected projects are:

  • Reacting to sounds
  • Photosynthesis Biobrick
  • Multistability

  •