Team:Paris/Modeling
From 2008.igem.org
(→Our train of thoughts...) |
(→Our train of thoughts...) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Furthermore, we wished to describe our thought process, the way these models interact, their respective roles. | Furthermore, we wished to describe our thought process, the way these models interact, their respective roles. | ||
An overall description of the way we model our biological system can be found below : | An overall description of the way we model our biological system can be found below : | ||
- | [[Team:Paris/Modeling/History | + | <center>[[Team:Paris/Modeling/History|Read more !]]</center> |
= BOB (Based On Bibliography) Approach = | = BOB (Based On Bibliography) Approach = |
Revision as of 00:03, 14 October 2008
Our train of thoughts...We hereby propose different and complementary approaches to model the biological system. We found interesting to explain two of the paths that we chose to follow in order to understand and predict our system. It is important to note that both models aim at different goals in the process of understanding our system. Furthermore, we wished to describe our thought process, the way these models interact, their respective roles. An overall description of the way we model our biological system can be found below : BOB (Based On Bibliography) ApproachOur first approach is quite rough and simple but effective. The goal here was to guess the behavior of our Bacteri'OClock, considering the overall system. Since it is a preliminary approach, we could not yet fill the model with data from the wet lab. This is why our work is mainly based on a bibliographic work, which allows us to use parameters and data from scientific articles. The key points of this approach:
APE (APE Parameters Estimation) ApproachThe second approach was motivated by our will to characterize our system in the most precise way. What is at stake here is to determine the "real parameters" that govern the dynamics of our system.
Old but still usefull pages |