"
Team:KULeuven/1 September 2008
From 2008.igem.org
(New page: {{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/Header}} == Lab Work == === Wet Lab === * We tried to add the second part of the UmuD tag with the 91bp-primer. We had very sharp and extremely beautiful bands, bu...) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/Styling}} | ||
{{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/Header}} | {{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/Header}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/New_Day/Date_Retriever}} | ||
== Lab Work == | == Lab Work == | ||
=== Wet Lab === | === Wet Lab === | ||
| - | + | We did a lot of PCRs today. We tried to add the second part of the UmuD tag with the 91bp-primer. We had very sharp and extremely beautiful bands, but they seemed three times too long: FAIL. This will be done again tomorrow, with primers 2.1 and 2.2. The antisense LuxI PCR resulted in a smear: FAIL again. To be done again tomorrow. We also did a PCR to test the ligations. | |
| - | + | ||
| + | We miniprepped the ligations we streaked out yesterday and part [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R1052 R1052] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0040 R0040]. It's the second time we miniprep R1052 and the concentrations was two times very low. The registry shows that there are a few problems with this part. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We made some digests: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_C0056 C0056] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_C0061 C0061] with ''Spe''I and ''Pst''I and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0040 R0040] with ''Spe''I and ''Eco''RI. We couldn't see R0040 on gel and C0056 seemed to be too big, only C0061 was ok. We purified C0061 and C0056. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We made a ligation of [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_C0061 C0061]+[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_B0015 B0015] (cut with ''Pst''I instead of ''Eco''RI). | ||
=== Dry Lab === | === Dry Lab === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ethics... | ||
==== Modeling ==== | ==== Modeling ==== | ||
| - | + | Latex-tool... | |
| + | Multi-cell... | ||
| - | == | + | ==== Wiki ==== |
| - | + | Components section has been updated further. Also the modeling section is getting some new lines and graphics ... | |
| - | + | ||
Latest revision as of 13:06, 16 October 2008
| << return to notebook | return to homepage >> | ||
| < previous friday | ← yesterday | tomorrow → | next monday > |
Contents |
Lab Work
Wet Lab
We did a lot of PCRs today. We tried to add the second part of the UmuD tag with the 91bp-primer. We had very sharp and extremely beautiful bands, but they seemed three times too long: FAIL. This will be done again tomorrow, with primers 2.1 and 2.2. The antisense LuxI PCR resulted in a smear: FAIL again. To be done again tomorrow. We also did a PCR to test the ligations.
We miniprepped the ligations we streaked out yesterday and part [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R1052 R1052] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0040 R0040]. It's the second time we miniprep R1052 and the concentrations was two times very low. The registry shows that there are a few problems with this part.
We made some digests: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_C0056 C0056] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_C0061 C0061] with SpeI and PstI and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0040 R0040] with SpeI and EcoRI. We couldn't see R0040 on gel and C0056 seemed to be too big, only C0061 was ok. We purified C0061 and C0056.
We made a ligation of [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_C0061 C0061]+[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_B0015 B0015] (cut with PstI instead of EcoRI).
Dry Lab
Ethics...
Modeling
Latex-tool... Multi-cell...
Wiki
Components section has been updated further. Also the modeling section is getting some new lines and graphics ...
