Team:Paris/Analysis/Construction
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Conclusion) |
(→Classical model and temporal rescaling) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
*Since we can know easily the value of the real half-time, we may know the real timescale out of our computations. We kept the designation “degradation rate” for convenience, so as not to mix up with the dilution that occurs with the HSL in the synchronisation step. | *Since we can know easily the value of the real half-time, we may know the real timescale out of our computations. We kept the designation “degradation rate” for convenience, so as not to mix up with the dilution that occurs with the HSL in the synchronisation step. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | decomposer time | ||
+ | |||
+ | on a utilisé les promoters activity de l'article | ||
+ | quand on savait pas : fonction de hill | ||
+ | |||
+ | par contre dire que c'est normalisé pour toutes les protéine afin que les concentrations soient entre o et 1 (afin de pouvoir comparer les effets...) | ||
= Conclusion = | = Conclusion = |
Revision as of 15:38, 25 October 2008
Model construction
= Introduction = biblio A FAIRE We wished to build a model that could be used to help us design our biological system. We shall hereby describe the asumptions we made
Classical model and temporal rescaling
on a utilisé les promoters activity de l'article quand on savait pas : fonction de hill par contre dire que c'est normalisé pour toutes les protéine afin que les concentrations soient entre o et 1 (afin de pouvoir comparer les effets...) ConclusionThis finally gave the following equations : Now you have had a good overlook of our model, go see a more detailed justification! LiensBibliography
|