Team:KULeuven/29 August 2008

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 07:38, 2 September 2008

dock/undock dropdown

Lab Work

Wet Lab

A liquid culture was made of the new parts and the ligations we did. We will Miniprep them tomorrow.
We also did a colony PCR to test yesterday's ligations. They don't seem to be correct.
Some more digests were made and purified out of gel:

cut with XbaI and EcoRI -> B0032

cut with XbaI and PstI -> B0015

cut with SpeI and PstI -> C0012, C0040, C0060, K145015, K145001 and K145151

Ligations were set up: R0011+B0032, (R0040+J23922)+(J23109+J23032), C0012+B0015, C0060+B0015, C0040+B0015, K145015+B0015, K145001+B0015 and K145151+B0015.

Dry Lab

Had another good meeting today. Possibility was raised that adenosine methylation by the dam methylase is inhibiting our XbaI GATC restrictions. Checking it out. JM109 is probably dam+ so XbaI shouldn't cut, while for example JM110 and DM1 (Invitrogen) are dam-. If we want to use XbaI we'll need dam- cells.

Ethics, bioethics and more ethics.

Modeling

Nick continued his succesful work on multicellularity in MatLab. He even created a graph that looks like the blueprints of some modern building + created bacteria that could go back in time ;)

We were also able to show the relative effect of the filter by outputting some graphs in MatLab.

Wiki

All parameters on the wiki AND in the MatLab model have been checked and should be correct.

Remarks

<< return to notebook			return to homepage >>
< previous friday	← yesterday	tomorrow →	next monday >

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 === Dry Lab ===
 Had another good meeting today. Possibility was raised that adenosine methylation by the dam methylase is inhibiting our XbaI GATC restrictions. Checking it out. JM109 is probably dam+ so XbaI shouldn't cut, while for example JM110 and DM1 (Invitrogen) are dam-. If we want to use XbaI we'll need dam- cells.
+Ethics, bioethics and more ethics.
 ==== Modeling ====